| Title |
Patients’ and Nephrologists’ Evaluation of Patient-Facing Smartphone Apps for CKD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2215/cjn.10370818 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karandeep Singh, Clarissa J Diamantidis, Shreyas Ramani, Nrupen A Bhavsar, Peter Mara, Julia Warner, Jorge Rodriguez, Tianshi Wang, Julie Wright-Nunes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 35% |
| Spain | 10 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Senegal | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 70% |
| Scientists | 15 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 15% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2021.
All research outputs
#379,694
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#234
of 4,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,596
of 364,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#12
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.