@JGuentherAuthor @ak_america You should pick up a statistics book. Meanwhile check out this randomised trial https://t.co/NpUX4YTBs8
@DrFranckClarot Ma préférée : https://t.co/Api5gvuHZi
@michael_trumper @MDomino07 @davidwebbshow @MariaBartiromo @geoff_deweaver Not sure what you mean. This is my point. https://t.co/jElrgP085w
@verguts Geen nood. Volg de zwaartekracht. Het is overigens niet bewezen dat een parachute helpt. https://t.co/7G9nuWKNZw
@Liberalistene Det er ikke gode randomiserte studier som dokumenterer effekt av fallskjermbruk ved hopping fra fly heller : https://t.co/ciblUWYEPB
@NephJC @VPrasadMDMPH @nephjc Oh! 😆 For reference here’s the follow through ‘RCT’ that was inspired by the original article. https://t.co/BQHq4xMuhK #NephJC
@ABertheim @greg_travis @Ceri_turns @theLUCASTDS @lenapatsa Ah! Another volunteer to be the control in a parachute study! https://t.co/VL8wKG3rRz
As I suspected... https://t.co/Odld1kNdsU
O estudo anterior não encontrou evidências a favor do uso de paraquedas. Este estudo de 2018 realizou um ensaio clínico randomizado c/ pessoas que saltaram do avião com e sem paraquedas. Infelizmente tem uma limitação muito séria: não foi duplo cego. http
@ScottAdamsSays @TheObliqueGeek @ScottAdamsSays have you seen this study? Hilarious take on published studies. This appears to be why you’d have to prove the sun exists: https://t.co/XROAaVHbm2
今日の心理学で出てきた論文はこれか。まあユーモア枠として掲載されたみたいだけど。 https://t.co/FcZkZ1PUoJ
@taipan168 @profesterman I was referring to that RCT in my tweet - and you're lying about it. In fact it "shows" it is safe to jump out without one. "Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury" https://t.co/k8vCgIqRSb
RT @oneforall1024: @golfkilo7 https://t.co/zIzeQVd9pc 前まではRCT原理主義的だったのですが、これを読んでRCTであってもしっかり条件などを確認することが大切なんだなと思いました。
RT @oneforall1024: @golfkilo7 https://t.co/zIzeQVd9pc 前まではRCT原理主義的だったのですが、これを読んでRCTであってもしっかり条件などを確認することが大切なんだなと思いました。
@fasc1nate Parachutes are needed to prevent death https://t.co/Bf7DXSMI47
@Sinisa_Subotic @jonathanstea There was a study in the prestigious British Medical Journal. They found that parachutes did NOT significantly reduce death or major injury. Spoiler: It was intentional example of statistical abuse and poor study design. Rea
RCTならなんでも信頼できるわけじゃないよ、という有名学会誌に投稿された論文https://t.co/GtvSNXNEqD
@georgetolisjr https://t.co/ZVmzKXxzuX Have you seen this? The absolute pinnacle of academic achievement in my humble opinion. 😂😂😂
RT @AJRaina01: @YouAreLobbyLud Just quote the BMJ parachute study to highlight the ridiculousness of doing RCTs for everything. They publis…
RT @AJRaina01: @YouAreLobbyLud Just quote the BMJ parachute study to highlight the ridiculousness of doing RCTs for everything. They publis…
@YouAreLobbyLud Just quote the BMJ parachute study to highlight the ridiculousness of doing RCTs for everything. They publish it every decade. Its very well written satire. Here’s the latest iteration. https://t.co/NzRGjIMJE4
@onastrangeday @erocdrahs My favorite paper on the subject https://t.co/wx7eh52BJf
@KvotheTheArcane Absolutely bonkers that this is a thing and that some academics feel the ethics of doing this to people are sound. Probably the same guys who couldn’t find anyone to volunteer for a double blind no chute that didn’t involve static on groun
@VeritasEver @19joho A limited RCT has been done on parachutes. https://t.co/nJYElifjTf It found no difference in the groups. The design may have weaknesses. So another RCT needs to be done. Alas the Ethics Committee for my funding won’t approve. Obviously
@19joho “If I could snap my fingers and do a massive RCT of everything, I would.” Really? Would you?😜 https://t.co/NzRGjIMJE4
@MaxJordan_N Reminds me of this BMJ article. Sometimes you just can’t do a RCT. https://t.co/ANtfjspkYn
@MaxJordan_N Reminds me of this lancet article. Sometimes you just can’t do a RCT https://t.co/ANtfjspkYn
@andrewfenton @liron @pmarca Kind of odd to use the word "but" to agree with someone. Point is, just because a threat is ostensibly enormous doesn't mean it's not real, or even that full-scale experiments need to be done to prove consequences. https://t.c
La seule étude contre placebo sur l'efficacité clinique d'un parachute est statistiquement non significative! https://t.co/O5RPq1Cqve Un commentaire @etienneKlein? (via @Scintigraphiste).
Aucune donnée avec des vrais gens ? Qu’à cela ne tienne ! En 2018, une équipe de chercheurs publie enfin la 1re étude d’efficacité du parachute chez l’Homme. Soit tout de même 220 ans après l’invention du parachute ! https://t.co/B1UYbDGnFq
RT @ChadDKollas: @GhanaboyPharmd @AndrewMoorepain @AsafKlaf There is a published RCT of parachute effectiveness in @bmj_latest. Parachutes…
RT @ChadDKollas: @GhanaboyPharmd @AndrewMoorepain @AsafKlaf There is a published RCT of parachute effectiveness in @bmj_latest. Parachutes…
RT @ChadDKollas: @GhanaboyPharmd @AndrewMoorepain @AsafKlaf There is a published RCT of parachute effectiveness in @bmj_latest. Parachutes…
RT @ChadDKollas: @GhanaboyPharmd @AndrewMoorepain @AsafKlaf There is a published RCT of parachute effectiveness in @bmj_latest. Parachutes…
@GhanaboyPharmd @AndrewMoorepain @AsafKlaf There is a published RCT of parachute effectiveness in @bmj_latest. Parachutes were no more effective than empty backpacks when jumping from a small biplane or a helicopter… … when they were parked on the ground.
@StuartJRitchie @normative A study showing that when jumping out of an airplane, wearing a parachute doesn't reduce the risk of death or major injury: https://t.co/VRfH6db5ZI
:) Attn - @kshashi https://t.co/y3ou5VTqc9
It has come to my attention that the anti-vaxxers have been talking about RCTs recently, so it's time to repost this bona fide classic: "Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial" https://t.co
@Carmendejs @LeilaYLab @Conquenseopina @glopllu69 Madre mía... Toma anda. https://t.co/6kWKUc2Qbb
RT @ojedathies: @joaqmorera @drmiguelmarcos @JoseCamposMD @JuanGrvas @mlalanda Tampoco es muy fuerte la evidencia a favor de usar paracaída…
@joaqmorera @drmiguelmarcos @JoseCamposMD @JuanGrvas @mlalanda Tampoco es muy fuerte la evidencia a favor de usar paracaídas al lanzarse de un avión: https://t.co/bziK7158dh
@TrattenRabbit There was only one that I know of, showing that they have no significant effect on death or injury when jumping from airplanes. (oh no, the thumbnail nearly gives away the joke) https://t.co/tNaQtAflnQ
@ButNotTheCity I always reccomend them for the control group here https://t.co/ixX7HynYby
@billmaher He’s wrong. There’s no study comparing aspirin to placebo during an acute heart attack because we know it would be unethical. Many studies are abandoned prior to completion because the placebo (or treatment) group has much worse outcomes than th
@lthe_z @Citizen4Sci @laputassiere Mais c'est mieux lorsque l'on dispose d'un essai contrôlé randomisé. C'est le cas concernant le parachute. "Utilisation parachute pour prévenir la mort et les traumatismes majeurs lors du saut d'avion: essai contrôlé rand
@SCMountainGoat @JennyChachan Like the double blind study on the effectiveness of parachutes… https://t.co/nJfX8X0pDk
@JoelWHarper @MarcBonten @P_Bruijning Besides, the study conducted here was not well-designed. Measurements during lockdown, just below ceiling level, with windows open. https://t.co/u8XaFzhq93
@GreenWalker92 It wasn't fun, unfortunately... I don't understand the logic of these people. Another well known example: https://t.co/tEKQZ0z2gq
@DrMarkBurnley It’s embarrassing. On the topic of RCT absolutists: https://t.co/NGNZAKLAfA
@jljcolorado Random control treatments are the only reliable way to do science. Even a RCT on parachute efficacy. (/S) https://t.co/w7FnXKOt2O .k5094
RT @ademoor: @joeyfox85 @jljcolorado Some interesting gravity-related RCT research has already been conducted though 🙂https://t.co/v8zvUpnw…
RT @ademoor: @joeyfox85 @jljcolorado Some interesting gravity-related RCT research has already been conducted though 🙂https://t.co/v8zvUpnw…
RT @RJ_NerdDad: @tylerblack32 @ENirenberg But if parachutes don't prevent 100% of fall injuries, then I refuse to wear one when I jump out…
@MarcBonten @P_Bruijning Well designed studies? Like this one? Study: parachute use does not reduce injury or death when jumping from an aircraft. https://t.co/q5xIFE08dW https://t.co/iKTWxmmaGH
RT @WouterW_Vreug: @pimjoosten LOL, @MarcBonten RCT… Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomize…
@pimjoosten LOL, @MarcBonten RCT… Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial. https://t.co/om0Uhlgumg
@joeyfox85 @jljcolorado Some interesting gravity-related RCT research has already been conducted though 🙂https://t.co/v8zvUpnwYB
@tylerblack32 @ENirenberg But if parachutes don't prevent 100% of fall injuries, then I refuse to wear one when I jump out of planes. Freedom! I did my own research. You're a shill for Big Parachute! https://t.co/12vs394Wdd
RT @RadicalLabGeek: This may be my fav peer review of all time: #bias #CriticalThought #BecauseScience #Mistrapolate https://t.co/m1bHxf…
@rishmishra I think there’s only been 1 RCT on whether parachutes prevent death and unfortunately it was inconclusive: https://t.co/Pqpbcr33Xm
RT @RadicalLabGeek: This may be my fav peer review of all time: #bias #CriticalThought #BecauseScience #Mistrapolate https://t.co/m1bHxf…
RT @1LewdElf: @pickledswans @jessesingal Sounds hypocritical but hey in the name of the science you’re clearly a vaunted peerless and right…
This may be my fav peer review of all time: #bias #CriticalThought #BecauseScience #Mistrapolate https://t.co/m1bHxfKw7o
@JimGleeson @JonJonAnimation @joaquinlife @KPSCALnews @SpeakUpAmerica_ @lapublichealth @CAPublicHealth @GavinNewsom @JaniceHahn @SupJaniceHahn @HKDetwiler @syderature @LindseyPHorvath You & SO many other RWNJs are hellbent on making excuses when the an
@SabiVM This famous RCT of parachutes is a great illustration of this point. Absence of RCTs is not an invitation to throw out all other knowledge. Rather, such limitation highlights the importance of interdisciplinary, multi-methods research. https://t.c
RT @ekverstania: So in 2018, a team of researchers did a study to address that omission. https://t.co/IXIJ2v8s4u
@pickledswans @jessesingal Sounds hypocritical but hey in the name of the science you’re clearly a vaunted peerless and righteous defender have you heard of https://t.co/Y5LkJMHNLD you should go offer to be part of the control group
@Jennifuh_B @jessesingal I think Singal and readers ought be the control group for the 2018 study that already showed the idiocy of France and Sweden’s dependence on RCTs as the definition of “high quality evidence” on their “studies” https://t.co/Y5LkJM
@Huippuproffa @moyh @EKalmanen Ei auta. Laskuvarjo ei vähennä kuolemia tai loukkaantumisia, ainakaan lentokoneesta hypätessä. Tarkalleen ottaen tuossa ei toki tutkittu koneesta putoamista, jonka vuoksi pitää hieman varoa yleistämistä!🙃 https://t.co/SrbXYKS
@GuyInSF2 @roboghost @UsingLyft There absolutely is a study, and it found no evidence of it having an effect on reducing injury https://t.co/1eYbzHTJrX
@wil_da_beast630 "Parachutes save lives" is kind of the ultimate troll version of this (although there is a [joke] study finding no impact!) https://t.co/1eYbzHTbCp
I read a paper today and it reminded me of this…..
RT @rwyeh: BREAKING NEWS!!! In the first ever randomized clinical trial, we demonstrated that parachutes did NOT prevent death or major in…
RT @DrCanuckMD: @OTirmizi It’s been studied well. Here’s the RCT. No difference in death or major injury. https://t.co/b3fZPPnfnT https://…
@UdahoDuncan @JGeralyn @chronicallybeee @TaylorLorenz And if you demand randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed specific studies for everything, here's a randomized controlled trial of parachutes that shows no difference from backpacks of the same weight whe
RT @DrCanuckMD: @OTirmizi It’s been studied well. Here’s the RCT. No difference in death or major injury. https://t.co/b3fZPPnfnT https://…
RT @TeresaDiVicenzo: Pseudo-Wissenschaft. Die Medien hauen sie nur so heraus. Willkommen im neuen Normal. #8Mäuse #IchmagauchFallschirme ht…
Pseudo-Wissenschaft. Die Medien hauen sie nur so heraus. Willkommen im neuen Normal. #8Mäuse #IchmagauchFallschirme https://t.co/e8Bhj6mXyo https://t.co/HfeCs8di4p
@Andrew_Freeland @snob_of @2Zippos @SJWilliams123 @michaelpsenger Randomized controlled trial of parachutes shows no difference: https://t.co/EANNRKQwgB https://t.co/BU0pnNlVtW
@ShaneyWright @JanetOkane @tessfalor @remissionbiome While some people wait for studies, others will grasp the nettle and try educated guesses. When medical science has fallen short, it's absolutely a good thing. Do we want studies to better understand mec
RT @CC14_CC14: @dgurdasani1 @jljcolorado @dgurdasani1, you might enjoy this randomised controlled trial study in the BMJ which investigated…
@kaypeyze @TheatreofZen @GovKathyHochul @MTA @PABusTerminal @NYstateparks @javitscenter @NYSDHSES Just like how there's no evidence that a parachute is more effective at preventing injury or death from jumping out of an airplane than a backpack of the same
@TRyanGregory There WAS a study on parachutes: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | https://t.co/Pz59IiCmRw
RT @CC14_CC14: @dgurdasani1 @jljcolorado @dgurdasani1, you might enjoy this randomised controlled trial study in the BMJ which investigated…
Oh, so good.👇
@HansCollin2 @NutrSinMarcas Es mi lectura también. Como regla general, mi postura a un paper es neutra y su lectura y reproducibilidad me dirá si es valorable o no. En este caso específico, a mi ver, pasa la prueba de la blancura. Aún así, siempre hay que
RT @CC14_CC14: @dgurdasani1 @jljcolorado @dgurdasani1, you might enjoy this randomised controlled trial study in the BMJ which investigated…
@ToshiAkima An RCT proved parachutes are not effective at reducing the chance of death when jumping from an airplane. https://t.co/12vs394Wdd
RT @CC14_CC14: @dgurdasani1 @jljcolorado @dgurdasani1, you might enjoy this randomised controlled trial study in the BMJ which investigated…