↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
274 tweeters
Title
Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity
Published in
Nature Geoscience, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0236-z
Authors

Alexandre Antonelli, W. Daniel Kissling, Suzette G. A. Flantua, Mauricio A. Bermúdez, Andreas Mulch, Alexandra N. Muellner-Riehl, Holger Kreft, H. Peter Linder, Catherine Badgley, Jon Fjeldså, Susanne A. Fritz, Carsten Rahbek, Frédéric Herman, Henry Hooghiemstra, Carina Hoorn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 274 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#53,072
of 11,948,050 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#179
of 2,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,449
of 152,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,948,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.