RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
Thank you @Dr_M_Guthridge, very useful info! If only we could work out how to get skeptical Drs to read some of the papers... #pwME #MECFS
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
@LeneFrank Det er over 15.000 videnskabelige artikler de kalder for mavefornemmelse https://t.co/s97CF0rDuA
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 papers and concluded: #MECFS is not a psychological disease but a serious chronic and multisystem disease https://t.co/ATUx1yPJTC https:/
@Johnwickspuppy1 @JAMA_current yes, the @NIH in their position paper on #MECFS are very clear on the involvement of #depression in #pwME. They state that: "Although psychological repercussions (such as depression) may accompany ME/CFS, it is not a primary
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: @CenterRes @scra "Although psychological repercussions (such as #depression) may accompany #MECFS, it is not a primary…
@CenterRes @scra "Although psychological repercussions (such as #depression) may accompany #MECFS, it is not a primary #psychological disease" From the @NIH position paper on #MECFS published in @AnnalsofIM #pwME #chronicillness https://t.co/hcAXcBgXVs
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 4 – #MECFS & #PEM sind psychosomatisch (...) #pwME [werden] "oft mit Skepsis, Unsicherheit & Bedenken behan…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 4 – #MECFS & #PEM sind psychosomatisch (...) #pwME [werden] "oft mit Skepsis, Unsicherheit & Bedenken behan…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 4 – #MECFS & #PEM sind psychosomatisch (...) #pwME [werden] "oft mit Skepsis, Unsicherheit & Bedenken behan…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 4 – #MECFS & #PEM sind psychosomatisch (...) #pwME [werden] "oft mit Skepsis, Unsicherheit & Bedenken behan…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 4 – #MECFS & #PEM sind psychosomatisch (...) #pwME [werden] "oft mit Skepsis, Unsicherheit & Bedenken behan…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 3 - Bei einigen #MECFS-Diagnosekriterien ist #PEM nicht einmal erforderlich Für die Oxford/Fukuda-Kriterien…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 3 - Bei einigen #MECFS-Diagnosekriterien ist #PEM nicht einmal erforderlich Für die Oxford/Fukuda-Kriterien…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 3 - Bei einigen #MECFS-Diagnosekriterien ist #PEM nicht einmal erforderlich Für die Oxford/Fukuda-Kriterien…
RT @MMissingGermany: ⭕️ MYTHOS 3 - Bei einigen #MECFS-Diagnosekriterien ist #PEM nicht einmal erforderlich Für die Oxford/Fukuda-Kriterien…
⭕️ MYTHOS 3 - Bei einigen #MECFS-Diagnosekriterien ist #PEM nicht einmal erforderlich Für die Oxford/Fukuda-Kriterien ist PEM nicht erforderlich. [Die] @NIH möchte, dass solche Definitionen ausgemustert werden ORIG TWEET @Dr_M_Guthridge https://t.co/95Ao
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
4. #MECFS and #PEM is psychological No The @NIH position paper on #MECFS states #pwME “.are often treated with skepticism, uncertainty, and apprehension and labeled as deconditioned or having a primary psychological disorder” @AnnalsofIM #medtwitter ht
@FionaPWME @RACGP @AmerMedicalAssn @CMA_Docs @medwma @NHSEngland @rcgp @NAGPIrl @NIH Yes, the Oxford criteria was used for diagnosing #MECFS for the #PACEtrial. The @NIH have recommended "retiring" the Oxford criteria because it will "impair progress and c
@maxdavie @emmajoy6 @MEMilitant1 @MECFSNews @CoyneoftheRealm @TEDx @TEDxBristol I know you've been given lots of information, but here is the NIH report https://t.co/T3uGvjGdSu The IOM report https://t.co/eKZDYjqsON Both separately rejected the current UK
RT @DamianFog: @speccymcspec This looks important too-New @NIH position paper on #ME #CFS #IrishMed https://t.co/87l4S7EloU https://t.co/0J…
RT @DamianFog: @speccymcspec This looks important too-New @NIH position paper on #ME #CFS #IrishMed https://t.co/87l4S7EloU https://t.co/0J…
RT @DamianFog: @speccymcspec This looks important too-New @NIH position paper on #ME #CFS #IrishMed https://t.co/87l4S7EloU https://t.co/0J…
RT @DamianFog: @speccymcspec This looks important too-New @NIH position paper on #ME #CFS #IrishMed https://t.co/87l4S7EloU https://t.co/0J…
RT @DamianFog: @speccymcspec This looks important too-New @NIH position paper on #ME #CFS #IrishMed https://t.co/87l4S7EloU https://t.co/0J…
RT @DamianFog: @speccymcspec This looks important too-New @NIH position paper on #ME #CFS #IrishMed https://t.co/87l4S7EloU https://t.co/0J…
@speccymcspec This looks important too-New @NIH position paper on #ME #CFS #IrishMed https://t.co/87l4S7EloU https://t.co/0Je1oqAkxH
@velogubbed @RonaMossMorris @MEAssociation Agree there is still plenty that needs clarifying - good paper here http://t.co/XQS6YELtPE
Lily Chu on (US) #P2P report on #MECFS: "Estimated annual economic burden of ME/CFS in the US is between $9-$54... http://t.co/H9JbzMyNZJ
Very interesting how #NIH and the #CDC have different economic burden outcomes. #NIH being much lower. Keep... http://t.co/V5fA9ZEeD2
Est. Annual Economic Burden of ME/CFS Between $9-$54 billion: Dr Lily Chu: Annals Comments: 17 July, 2015: http://t.co/zzgGbEkxqw #ME #CFS
Est. Annual Economic Burden of ME/CFS Between $9-$54 billion: Dr Lily Chu: Annals Comments: 17 July, 2015: http://t.co/zzgGbEkxqw #ME #CFS
Est. Annual Economic Burden of ME/CFS Between $9-$54 billion: Dr Lily Chu: Annals Comments: 17 July, 2015: http://t.co/zzgGbEkxqw #ME #CFS
Est. Annual Economic Burden of ME/CFS Between $9-$54 billion: Dr Lily Chu: Annals Comments: 17 July, 2015: http://t.co/zzgGbEkxqw #ME #CFS
Lily Chu on (US) #P2P report on #MECFS: "Estimated annual economic burden of ME/CFS in the US is between $9-$54... http://t.co/H9JbzMyNZJ
Comment by Lily Chu on (US) P2P report on ME/CFS: "Estimated annual economic burden of ME/CFS in the US is... http://t.co/AV6Z8UQCvy
Comment on P2P: "Estimated annual economic burden of #ME/#CFS in the US is between $9-$54 billion, not $2-$7 billion" http://t.co/SGdAXxKIzS
Interesting endorsement for biological nature of chronic fatigue syndrome as opposed to a psychological d/o http://t.co/J8KDRSmNnQ #CFS
Annals of Internal Medicine | Article http://t.co/tWrscuc0Fs #positionpaper #ME/CFS #geteducated #RNedu
@NIH 'need for "omics"-based drug repurposing and neurobiology studies' in ME/CFS. Who will respond to challenge? http://t.co/SR0aK0g5nD
@NIH 'need for "omics"-based drug repurposing and neurobiology studies' in ME/CFS. Who will respond to challenge? http://t.co/SR0aK0g5nD