RT @ABrokenBattery: Link to the Full Episode. https://t.co/tEUu1ll2eG References AHRQ https://t.co/wgUjbssGU6 NIH https://t.co/JLrxcFreI…
RT @ABrokenBattery: Link to the Full Episode. https://t.co/tEUu1ll2eG References AHRQ https://t.co/wgUjbssGU6 NIH https://t.co/JLrxcFreI…
Link to the Full Episode. https://t.co/tEUu1ll2eG References AHRQ https://t.co/wgUjbssGU6 NIH https://t.co/JLrxcFreI2 Cochrane https://t.co/lBFkT9kRtY
RT @rosaalberola70: ¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 art…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @SGME_CH: Einzelnachweise (1/2) 1/22: https://t.co/IHDpW5sAdj 2/22: https://t.co/wThBX4uS9z 3/22: https://t.co/sAJ12mhJoq https://t.c…
References 1/2 2/22 https://t.co/IHDpW5sAdj 3/22 https://t.co/wThBX4uS9z 4/22 https://t.co/sAJ12mhJoq https://t.co/Z71ywbvTH6 5/22 https://t.co/TxOD7UXtSk 6/22 https://t.co/bNGa6Ta9Eg 7-9/22 https://t.co/TjLytqqxXy 10/22 https://t.co/cBNEun503t
RT @SGME_CH: Einzelnachweise (1/2) 1/22: https://t.co/IHDpW5sAdj 2/22: https://t.co/wThBX4uS9z 3/22: https://t.co/sAJ12mhJoq https://t.c…
RT @SGME_CH: Einzelnachweise (1/2) 1/22: https://t.co/IHDpW5sAdj 2/22: https://t.co/wThBX4uS9z 3/22: https://t.co/sAJ12mhJoq https://t.c…
Einzelnachweise (1/2) 1/22: https://t.co/IHDpW5sAdj 2/22: https://t.co/wThBX4uS9z 3/22: https://t.co/sAJ12mhJoq https://t.co/Z71ywbvTH6 4/22: https://t.co/TxOD7UXtSk 5/22: https://t.co/bNGa6Ta9Eg 6-8/22: https://t.co/TjLytqqxXy 9/22: https://t.co/cBN
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @rosaalberola70: ¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 art…
@bmkrohn1 @Nina_Steinkopf "In particular, continuing to use the Oxford definition may impair progress and cause harm. Therefore, for progress to occur, we recommend that this definition be retired" https://t.co/jIsaP5YQSR
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: 3. Some #MECFS diagnostic criteria don’t even require #PEM, surely its not important No The Oxford and Fukuda Criteri…
3. Algunos #EMsfc los criterios de diagnóstico ni siquiera requieren #PEM , seguramente no es importante ➡️NO " Los criterios de Oxford y Fukuda no requieren #PEM por eso el @NIH quiere que tales definiciones sean "retiradas"" https://t.co/uCVwR5bYVh
RT @jifoulger: @Dan_Wyke @bcdelaney1 @RCPhysicians @NICEComms @bodgoddard In 2015 @NIH published a report that reviewed the evidence, this…
@Dan_Wyke @bcdelaney1 @RCPhysicians @NICEComms @bodgoddard In 2015 @NIH published a report that reviewed the evidence, this is a measure of how far behind UK healthcare is. https://t.co/EUZZcLftgN
@BPSpsy_therapy @CDCgov nor seeking secondary gain. These patients have multiple pathophysiological changes that affect multiple systems." @NIH adds (https://t.co/JHiPJfkxrh): "Although psychological repercussions (such as depression) may accompany ME/CF
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
@abcdefg94439163 @Apresj100Fiona @theNAMedicine @CDCgov These patients have multiple pathophysiological changes that affect multiple systems.” https://t.co/6IGQEaom9f And the @NIH: "Although psychological repercussions (such as depression) may accompany
RT @marydimmock: To White & Creed: In 2015, NIH said this in Annals: "Furthermore, the multiple case definitions for ME/ CFS have hindered…
RT @marydimmock: To White & Creed: In 2015, NIH said this in Annals: "Furthermore, the multiple case definitions for ME/ CFS have hindered…
RT @marydimmock: To White & Creed: In 2015, NIH said this in Annals: "Furthermore, the multiple case definitions for ME/ CFS have hindered…
RT @marydimmock: To White & Creed: In 2015, NIH said this in Annals: "Furthermore, the multiple case definitions for ME/ CFS have hindered…
RT @marydimmock: To White & Creed: In 2015, NIH said this in Annals: "Furthermore, the multiple case definitions for ME/ CFS have hindered…
To White & Creed: In 2015, NIH said this in Annals: "Furthermore, the multiple case definitions for ME/ CFS have hindered progress. In particular, continuing to use the Oxford definition may impair progress and cause harm." Time to give it up! https://
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @sfc_cat: La National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health y la AHRQ para la @NIH revisaron 15,297 documentos y concluyeron: Que la…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
This thread, if you have any doubt.
RT @rosaalberola70: ¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 art…
RT @rosaalberola70: ¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 art…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
La National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health y la AHRQ para la @NIH revisaron 15,297 documentos y concluyeron: Que la SFC/EM no es una enfermedad psicológica sino una seria enfermedad crónica multisistémica. https://t.co/0DZNYdDRFa https://t.co/I
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @rosaalberola70: ¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 art…
RT @rosaalberola70: ¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 art…
RT @rosaalberola70: ¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 art…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
How about this!
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
¿Qué tal 15,297 artículos? Las Academias Nacionales de Ciencias @NASEM_Health y el AHRQ para @NIH revisaron 15,297 artículos y concluyeron: #EM/#SFC no es una enfermedad psicológica, sino una enfermedad grave crónica y multisistémica https://t.co/ZIvlnK
And yet the current guidelines in the UK promote the idea that talking therapy and exercise are all you need to be "cured" of #ME Might as well try to cure a broken arm by sticking it into a swan's mouth and calling it a hamster.
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…
RT @Dr_M_Guthridge: How about 15,297 papers? The National Academies of Sciences @NASEM_Health and the AHRQ for the @NIH reviewed 15,297 pa…