↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group: Conclusions and Recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Care, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 7,896)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
124 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
469 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group: Conclusions and Recommendations
Published in
Diabetes Care, May 2018
DOI 10.2337/dci18-0019
Pubmed ID
Authors

William T. Cefalu, Daniel E. Dawes, Gina Gavlak, Dana Goldman, William H. Herman, Karen Van Nuys, Alvin C. Powers, Simeon I. Taylor, Alan L. Yatvin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 469 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 27%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 18 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,302
of 14,167,133 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Care
#2
of 7,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130
of 275,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Care
#1
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,167,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.