| Title |
Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Botany, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ajb2.1019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen A. Smith, Joseph W. Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 66 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 55 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 536 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 19% |
| Researcher | 79 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 8% |
| Other | 80 | 15% |
| Unknown | 123 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 239 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 79 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Unknown | 134 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#583,385
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Botany
#39
of 4,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,340
of 457,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Botany
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.