↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathy, and thoracic outlet syndrome: how to differentiate? Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathy, and thoracic outlet syndrome: how to differentiate? Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, September 2004
DOI 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0179
Pubmed ID
Authors

John E McGillicuddy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 22 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,239,802
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
#643
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,101
of 69,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.