↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2008
DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e318169ce03
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria L. Handa, Mark E. Lockhart, Julia R. Fielding, Catherine S. Bradley, Linda Brubakery, Geoffrey W. Cundiffy, Wen Ye, Holly E. Richter

Abstract

To use static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare dimensions of the bony pelvis and soft tissue structures in a sample of African-American and white women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Other 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 52%
Engineering 9 17%
Unspecified 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#893,554
of 9,726,029 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#904
of 5,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,376
of 183,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#14
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,726,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.