↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2008
DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e318169ce03
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria L. Handa, Mark E. Lockhart, Julia R. Fielding, Catherine S. Bradley, Linda Brubakery, Geoffrey W. Cundiffy, Wen Ye, Holly E. Richter

Abstract

To use static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare dimensions of the bony pelvis and soft tissue structures in a sample of African-American and white women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Other 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 51%
Engineering 9 18%
Unspecified 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#837,956
of 11,748,056 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#831
of 5,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,858
of 188,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#10
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,748,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.