↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Genome-wide association meta-analysis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection identifies risk variants and genes related to artery integrity and tissue-mediated coagulation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
94 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection identifies risk variants and genes related to artery integrity and tissue-mediated coagulation
Published in
Nature Genetics, May 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41588-023-01410-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Adlam, Takiy-Eddine Berrandou, Adrien Georges, Christopher P. Nelson, Eleni Giannoulatou, Joséphine Henry, Lijiang Ma, Montgomery Blencowe, Tamiel N. Turley, Min-Lee Yang, Sandesh Chopade, Chris Finan, Peter S. Braund, Ines Sadeg-Sayoud, Siiri E. Iismaa, Matthew L. Kosel, Xiang Zhou, Stephen E. Hamby, Jenny Cheng, Lu Liu, Ingrid Tarr, David W. M. Muller, Valentina d’Escamard, Annette King, Liam R. Brunham, Ania A. Baranowska-Clarke, Stéphanie Debette, Philippe Amouyel, Jeffrey W. Olin, Snehal Patil, Stephanie E. Hesselson, Keerat Junday, Stavroula Kanoni, Krishna G. Aragam, Adam S. Butterworth, Marysia S. Tweet, Rajiv Gulati, Nicolas Combaret, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, Jonathan M. Kalman, Diane Fatkin, Aroon D. Hingorani, Jacqueline Saw, Tom R. Webb, Sharonne N. Hayes, Xia Yang, Santhi K. Ganesh, Timothy M. Olson, Jason C. Kovacic, Robert M. Graham, Nilesh J. Samani, Nabila Bouatia-Naji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 22 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Unspecified 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 24 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 429. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#70,255
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#103
of 7,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,737
of 399,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.