↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Genome-wide association meta-analysis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection identifies risk variants and genes related to artery integrity and tissue-mediated coagulation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
95 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection identifies risk variants and genes related to artery integrity and tissue-mediated coagulation
Published in
Nature Genetics, May 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41588-023-01410-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Adlam, Takiy-Eddine Berrandou, Adrien Georges, Christopher P. Nelson, Eleni Giannoulatou, Joséphine Henry, Lijiang Ma, Montgomery Blencowe, Tamiel N. Turley, Min-Lee Yang, Sandesh Chopade, Chris Finan, Peter S. Braund, Ines Sadeg-Sayoud, Siiri E. Iismaa, Matthew L. Kosel, Xiang Zhou, Stephen E. Hamby, Jenny Cheng, Lu Liu, Ingrid Tarr, David W. M. Muller, Valentina d’Escamard, Annette King, Liam R. Brunham, Ania A. Baranowska-Clarke, Stéphanie Debette, Philippe Amouyel, Jeffrey W. Olin, Snehal Patil, Stephanie E. Hesselson, Keerat Junday, Stavroula Kanoni, Krishna G. Aragam, Adam S. Butterworth, Mark K. Bakker, Ynte M. Ruigrok, Marysia S. Tweet, Rajiv Gulati, Nicolas Combaret, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, Jonathan M. Kalman, Diane Fatkin, Aroon D. Hingorani, Jacqueline Saw, Tom R. Webb, Sharonne N. Hayes, Xia Yang, Santhi K. Ganesh, Timothy M. Olson, Jason C. Kovacic, Robert M. Graham, Nilesh J. Samani, Nabila Bouatia-Naji

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Unspecified 3 25%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 428. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#63,008
of 24,526,614 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#91
of 7,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,510
of 367,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,526,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.