| Title |
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection identifies risk variants and genes related to artery integrity and tissue-mediated coagulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-023-01410-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Adlam, Takiy-Eddine Berrandou, Adrien Georges, Christopher P. Nelson, Eleni Giannoulatou, Joséphine Henry, Lijiang Ma, Montgomery Blencowe, Tamiel N. Turley, Min-Lee Yang, Sandesh Chopade, Chris Finan, Peter S. Braund, Ines Sadeg-Sayoud, Siiri E. Iismaa, Matthew L. Kosel, Xiang Zhou, Stephen E. Hamby, Jenny Cheng, Lu Liu, Ingrid Tarr, David W. M. Muller, Valentina d’Escamard, Annette King, Liam R. Brunham, Ania A. Baranowska-Clarke, Stéphanie Debette, Philippe Amouyel, Jeffrey W. Olin, Snehal Patil, Stephanie E. Hesselson, Keerat Junday, Stavroula Kanoni, Krishna G. Aragam, Adam S. Butterworth, Mark K. Bakker, Ynte M. Ruigrok, Marysia S. Tweet, Rajiv Gulati, Nicolas Combaret, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, Jonathan M. Kalman, Diane Fatkin, Aroon D. Hingorani, Jacqueline Saw, Tom R. Webb, Sharonne N. Hayes, Xia Yang, Santhi K. Ganesh, Timothy M. Olson, Jason C. Kovacic, Robert M. Graham, Nilesh J. Samani, Nabila Bouatia-Naji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 18% |
| France | 15 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Australia | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 46 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 40 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 429. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#64,425
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#95
of 7,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,555
of 371,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.