RT @BillyBostickson: @Aceofspades256 @stuartjdneil @R_H_Ebright @Ayjchan @mattwridley @RutgersU @BallouxFrancois Poor little Virologists, w…
RT @BillyBostickson: @Aceofspades256 @stuartjdneil @R_H_Ebright @Ayjchan @mattwridley @RutgersU @BallouxFrancois Poor little Virologists, w…
@Aceofspades256 @stuartjdneil @R_H_Ebright @Ayjchan @mattwridley @RutgersU @BallouxFrancois Poor little Virologists, worried about their funding? Virology under the Microscope—a Call for Funding https://t.co/dNxdf5fgzb https://t.co/dFBotpoXEc
@BillyBostickson @stuartjdneil @R_H_Ebright @Ayjchan @mattwridley @RutgersU @BallouxFrancois STEM scientists you say? So engineers and mathematicians. A far better way to see what people that actually work in the field think is to see what has been publis
@scotub You could just as easily ascertain a consensus from what has been published. This review had 156 authors https://t.co/bQfUNXjM2T
RT @Biorealism: New papers undermine the papers they rely on though: Spatial statistics experts show market epicentre claims are flawed. …
RT @Biorealism: New papers undermine the papers they rely on though: Spatial statistics experts show market epicentre claims are flawed. …
New papers undermine the papers they rely on though: Spatial statistics experts show market epicentre claims are flawed. https://t.co/9g7T6ust6C Jesse Bloom showed market samples don't support market origin. https://t.co/rorquFs1wm Ascertainment bias i
@henri_mourant It was that commentary with 156 authors that convinced me that there was clearly a consensus at that point https://t.co/bQfUNXjM2T
@Dissenting2020 @MJnanostretch Even more specifically, it's all that in the context of PPP viruses. Of course, they know all this - it's not a subtle point. But they keep trying... Check out this Jan '23 letter by 156 virologists. https://t.co/B9TvYNo
RT @JVirology: ASM Editors-in-Chief Goodrum (#jvirology) and Imperiale (@mSphereJ) add to the https://t.co/aGrf7bTuCu discussion here: http…
RT @RobLawrencium: As the SARS2 origin discussions heat up again, this recently published viewpoint from dozens of virologists (including m…
@NateSilver538 If you want to promote rational, open, nuanced, discussion on this topic, you probably shouldn't be promoting Ebright and his tweets. But here are 70 other people with actual expertise in virology and epidemiology that actually are taking th
RT @Z7o0Y: 任何关于SARS-2的“人造”或“实验室泄漏”的说法都没有任何科学依据。科学界现在普遍认为SARS-2来自自然界。https://t.co/6TrXviAj4u
@SaskiaPopescu @statnews @FuturistYB @angie_rasmussen Has ePPP research ever contributed to an effective vaccine, medication, or any positive health outcome? This article only provides two examples of 'benefits' from genuine ePPP, and the only 'benefit' i
@jvipondmd @righttoknowus Absolutely. There are many: https://t.co/ZcyiZCX2cQ
@nlpnyc @meridianchaos @K_G_Andersen As asinine + paranoid a response as HIV/AIDS denialists gave in response to the Durban Declaration. https://t.co/OvhA0yLWm0 https://t.co/1WMENlj596 https://t.co/90DJUhhTBL
RT @DavidBahry: @KatzOnEarth @mikeydoubled Did you even read the abstract? My paper [https://t.co/gJ2kQ7GtgE] is a critical comment on tha…
RT @DavidBahry: @KatzOnEarth @mikeydoubled Did you even read the abstract? My paper [https://t.co/gJ2kQ7GtgE] is a critical comment on tha…
RT @DavidBahry: @KatzOnEarth @mikeydoubled Did you even read the abstract? My paper [https://t.co/gJ2kQ7GtgE] is a critical comment on tha…
RT @DavidBahry: @KatzOnEarth @mikeydoubled Did you even read the abstract? My paper [https://t.co/gJ2kQ7GtgE] is a critical comment on tha…
@KatzOnEarth @mikeydoubled Did you even read the abstract? My paper [https://t.co/gJ2kQ7GtgE] is a critical comment on that one [https://t.co/FzHsAEKMjY]. Obviously mine links to theirs, and theirs links to mine. If you're so confused by this you find it
Virology under the Microscope—a Call for Rational Discourse https://t.co/4w0GpcW0pq
@ACasadevall1 Professor - those of us who are not scientists have to strongly lean on the judgment of members of the scientific community. I’m curious - where do you currently lean on the zoonotic vs. lab-leak question? https://t.co/wPQ3YalEDS
RT @Z7o0Y: 任何关于SARS-2的“人造”或“实验室泄漏”的说法都没有任何科学依据。科学界现在普遍认为SARS-2来自自然界。https://t.co/6TrXviAj4u
Rational, lone scientific voices, remind me of this quote “One man with courage is a majority” attributed to Andrew Jackson!
...stammt ja auch von amerikanischen Mikrobiologen https://t.co/jkG9CTsgdI https://t.co/K5HneVOFFx
RT @KlausRiede: wobei beim "related content" Virology under the microscope ja gar keine deutschen #Virologen dabei sind https://t.co/jkG9CT…
wobei beim "related content" Virology under the microscope ja gar keine deutschen #Virologen dabei sind https://t.co/jkG9CTsgdI
RT @DavidBahry: Here's the original "Call for rational discourse" editorial, cross-published by @GoodrumVirusLab et al. in the three @ASMic…
The Letter by 156 Virologists "Virology under the Microscope—a Call for Rational Discourse" https://t.co/dNxdf5fgzb and the timely critical response by @DavidBahry https://t.co/wim7bYScPs A must read!
RT @DavidBahry: Here's the original "Call for rational discourse" editorial, cross-published by @GoodrumVirusLab et al. in the three @ASMic…
Here's the original "Call for rational discourse" editorial, cross-published by @GoodrumVirusLab et al. in the three @ASMicrobiology journals @JVirology, @mbiojournal, and @mSphereJ: https://t.co/FzHsAELk9w
@freddiesayers @ianbirrell @unherd Feeding confirmation bias is not good journalism. Have the humility to respect those who work entire careers inside the domain and what they can teach you. See if you can put your biases to one side while hearing these…
RT @NatureMicrobiol: ICYMI: Virologists unite to call for rational discourse about GOF research. https://t.co/aM7Q2XqZfU
RT @NatureMicrobiol: ICYMI: Virologists unite to call for rational discourse about GOF research. https://t.co/aM7Q2XqZfU
RT @NatureMicrobiol: ICYMI: Virologists unite to call for rational discourse about GOF research. https://t.co/aM7Q2XqZfU
ICYMI: Virologists unite to call for rational discourse about GOF research. https://t.co/aM7Q2XqZfU
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Reminiscent of the Durban Declaration as a response to the conspiracy theories of HIV/AIDS denialists during that pande…
RT @RobLawrencium: @WashburneAlex Statement from 70+ scientists saying they favor natural origin explanation unless shown otherwise. These…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Reminiscent of the Durban Declaration as a response to the conspiracy theories of HIV/AIDS denialists during that pande…
Reminiscent of the Durban Declaration as a response to the conspiracy theories of HIV/AIDS denialists during that pandemic. Pandemics inflame conspiracism among some non-experts. https://t.co/1WMENlj596 https://t.co/kCtfqJvwX4 https://t.co/d8GzvJIgQF ht
@WashburneAlex Statement from 70+ scientists saying they favor natural origin explanation unless shown otherwise. These are mostly pretty mainstream virologists, many of whom have studied CoVs for decades. Not a few. Not holdouts. And many rarely speak wit
@JohnMolka @edwardcholmes Small group😂 156 virologists authored this paper. There is nothing like this for a lab leak. The Redfield's of the virology community are incredibly rare https://t.co/bQfUNXkjSr
As the SARS2 origin discussions heat up again, this recently published viewpoint from dozens of virologists (including my former postdoc advisor) is worth a read. Gives a nice review of all the safeguards currently in place for virology research. https://t
RT @Aceofspades256: @abhishek_s_1 @rubrogram @skepteis If it wasn't dispositive, you probably wouldn't have got 156 virologists citing it a…
@abhishek_s_1 @rubrogram @skepteis If it wasn't dispositive, you probably wouldn't have got 156 virologists citing it as one of the reasons why the strongest evidence supports zoonosis 🤷♂️ https://t.co/bQfUNXjM2T
@AaronRa07861480 @C_Kavanagh To give one example of what academics think, 156 of them authored this commentary https://t.co/bQfUNXjM2T
@nscalzo81 @HLewison @NateLestrange @ClayTravis Cite where you came to this definitive conclusion. Here is a recent paper from 150 virologists that have the exact opposite opinion. https://t.co/xv1ScEuuzv . Point is you don’t know and no one knows. You a
@TLVersteegh Cite a paper for you claim. Here’s mine https://t.co/xv1ScEuuzv
"The source of concern in this area is that changing a virus to add new functionality may yield a dangerous pathogen." "There are clearly experiments where the risks outweigh the benefits, and it is important that mechanisms exist to prevent such experime
@natashaloder @fayeflam @R_H_Ebright @Rebecca21951651 @PeterDaszak @OIGatHHS @StateOIG @NIHDirector @HansMahncke @JamieMetzl @zasdak @DrTedros @JeremyFarrar @SherylNYT @GOPoversight @HouseGOP @WHOSTP 1) Well, going by the recent letter by 156 virologists,
任何关于SARS-2的“人造”或“实验室泄漏”的说法都没有任何科学依据。科学界现在普遍认为SARS-2来自自然界。https://t.co/6TrXviAj4u
@jianmang051 @List72470788 @Eax171074 您如果真的是对科学,对真相有兴趣,请阅读这篇文章。https://t.co/6TrXviAj4u
Virology under the Microscope—a Call for Rational Discourse | mBio (Interesting take on Gain-of-Function). https://t.co/WcOsCUEfCr
ASM Editors-in-Chief Goodrum (#jvirology) and Imperiale (@mSphereJ) add to the https://t.co/aGrf7bTuCu discussion here: https://t.co/6zUhYItSGx
@asmicrobiology Editors-in-Chief Goodrum (#jvirology) and Imperiale (@mSphereJ) add to the https://t.co/aGrf7bTuCu discussion here: https://t.co/6zUhYItSGx
@Ayjchan 156 card-carrying virologists seem to think very highly of PD's work (they are talking about the GoF aspect here⬇️, but I am sure they are big fans of the whole enterprise): "Established danger from bat SARS-like coronavirus to humans" 🤦♂️🤦♂️
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
156 highly paid biotechnologists anxious to continue playing God with viruses writing in the magazine Virology are calling on governments to make sure gain of function research can continue unimpeded. https://t.co/JhuuZc7bsP
RT @mbalter: 8/ For the mBio commentary from virologists see: https://t.co/MvG8lYRWit
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @MosesHopes: @Risemelbourne @razorback11111 @sweettalkin1970 @LadyGahGahNot @JaggerAUS 1./ Epic rant. Watch this and make it go viral.…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
劳伦斯·塞林 这篇由150名病毒学家撰写的文章是政治污染科学的完美例子。他们声称“寻求促进理性话语的回归”,但他们漫不经心地驳回了Covid_19实验室起源的所有证据。欺诈。 #美国
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
這篇由 150 位病毒學家撰寫的文章是科學被政治污染的一個完美例子。 他們聲稱“尋求促進理性話語的回歸”,但他們隨隨便便地駁斥了#Covid_19 實驗室起源的所有證據。 欺詐。
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…
RT @LawrenceSellin: This article by 150 virologists is a perfect example of the political contamination of science. They claim to "seek to…