@MylesAusPol @9NewsAUS @eddy_meyer Won't be laughing soon lickspittle. https://t.co/sTr6O2C7b5 https://t.co/XcdUq4RFA1
RT @MosesHopes: @Risemelbourne @razorback11111 @sweettalkin1970 @LadyGahGahNot @JaggerAUS 1./ Epic rant. Watch this and make it go viral.…
@Risemelbourne @razorback11111 @sweettalkin1970 @LadyGahGahNot @JaggerAUS 1./ Epic rant. Watch this and make it go viral. These people want rationale discourse? Should have thought about that BEFORE you murdered people. https://t.co/sTr6O2C7b5 https://t
RT @MosesHopes: 156 scientists call for rationality and nuance around GOF. You think? After all the deaths and people injured for life.…
156 scientists call for rationality and nuance around GOF. You think? After all the deaths and people injured for life. You think? After decades of bio-warfare research. Everyone who put their name to this article is guilty. GUILTY. https://t.co/sTr6
156 scientists call for rationality and nuance around GOF. You think? After all the deaths and people injured for life. You think? After decades of bio-warfare research. Everyone who put their name to this article is guilty. GUILTY. https://t.co/sTr6O
RT @mbalter: 8/ For the mBio commentary from virologists see: https://t.co/MvG8lYRWit
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
Call for rational discourse to counter a small, vocal group of individuals who have seized upon legitimate concerns about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens to conflate uncertainties over the origins of #SARSCoV2. Thank a virologist tables h
@naglalakk Þetta er mjög gagnleg grein https://t.co/ZSOxQDp6rl
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
8/ For the mBio commentary from virologists see: https://t.co/MvG8lYRWit
RT @harishseshadri2: It's unbelievable how tone-deaf these "scientists" are. The Fouchier-Kawaoka H5N1 experiments are listed as benefits…
Virology under the Microscope—a Call for Rational Discourse https://t.co/IZi3meefRl
@nizzaneela @WashburneAlex @NPR It's from Table 2 of this strange letter. https://t.co/B9TvYNoVba Note they keep mixing up virology, GoF research and GOFROC. Even after doing that, they have to invoke a 2009 paper to claim "faster computers". Somehow,
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT @BUNKUROI: RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
RT こちらがその、完全に否定はされてないものの科学的根拠が特にない新型コロナ研究所流出説をことさら陰謀論的に喧伝する一部の言説に懸念を表明する文書。 連名のウイルス学者は全156人も! https://t.co/5NNpjZHrMG
It's unbelievable how tone-deaf these "scientists" are. The Fouchier-Kawaoka H5N1 experiments are listed as benefits of GOFROC. As is "faster computers", but that's just comical. https://t.co/B9TvYNoVba @mlipsitch @kesvelt @T_Inglesby @DavidRelman @Ste
Sadly, the virology community shows that they are incapable of autoregulation. They list GOF experiments uncritically, mixing speculative or real benefit. The paper considers solely USA, as if viruses knew frontiers. Very poor , very biased. https://t.co/
I agree w deconvolving LL&GOF but this is wrong &the references don't support it- who investigated LL? "While each of these possibilities is plausible &have been investigated, currently the zoonosis hypothesis has the strongest supporting evid
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
@mbalter @GoodrumVirusLab @NPR Regarding the ridiculous 100+ virologists assembled by @GoodrumVirusLab to try to salvage some remaining respectability--- Ideal spot for the Einstein quote in response to book "100 Authors against Eistein": "Why 100? If I we
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
A new #COVID19 pub from @UUtah researchers! Check it out: Virology under the Microscope-a Call for Rational Discourse https://t.co/OXfTRc9BJO @UofUResearch
Virology under the Microscope—a Call for Rational Discourse | mBio https://t.co/MBI2EQYMTk
RT @PeterDaszak: Full article signed by >150 virologists https://t.co/pfR8tPR6D5
@Laurie_Garrett I read this article just before checking Twitter https://t.co/GVqSiLK15X
RT @PeterDaszak: Full article signed by >150 virologists https://t.co/pfR8tPR6D5
great paper.
RT @EcoDeathWIV: Our advice for anti-truth conspiratorial kindergarten biologists: (1) Humility isn't necessary when our side controls the…
RT @cshperspectives: ASM journal process for assessing potential dual use research of concern (DURC)/gain of function (GOF) studies https:…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
And when you read about how things are *supposed* to work, it's all the more concerning. But then again, these are the regulations for virology research conducted inside the US, not in China. https://t.co/kNHiEGVGUD
ASM journal process for assessing potential dual use research of concern (DURC)/gain of function (GOF) studies https://t.co/u98DpG8k9R https://t.co/Dhvs8sdPm4
Full article signed by >150 virologists https://t.co/pfR8tPR6D5
RT @Graybea71861266: I can't believe that 156 virologists signed off on this: "The lab-origin hypothesis suggests an accident at best or ne…
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
RT @macroliter: Ahead of the @HHSGov NSABB meeting Jan 27 that will consider the merits of increased regulations on pathogen research, Dr.…
Just in case he deletes his link to it, too (as he did the tweet), this was the article whose authors he referred to as all “small fry” .. noting 5 exceptions, all men.. https://t.co/bhQQOiJnbo
Ahead of the @HHSGov NSABB meeting Jan 27 that will consider the merits of increased regulations on pathogen research, Dr. Richard Ebright, a key proponent of Lab Leak #OriginOfCovid wanted to establish his bona fides as a sexist person who is ignorant of
RT @Graybea71861266: I can't believe that 156 virologists signed off on this: "The lab-origin hypothesis suggests an accident at best or ne…
Virology under the Microscope-a Call for Rational Discourse https://t.co/d6vxIZltfa
Bingo.
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
Virology under the Microscope—a Call for Rational Discourse | mBio https://t.co/yhMIKcG9Az
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
Our advice for anti-truth conspiratorial kindergarten biologists: (1) Humility isn't necessary when our side controls the funds. (2) A new BSL-4 lab in your nearest densest metro area might help you understand. (3) Any suspicious DARPA proposal was a lat
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
@jmcrookston It's a virology day! https://t.co/IZpNvqsJlB
Rationale discourse: why are these 156 virologists writing off the lab leak hypothesis instead of calling for the release of WIV's viral catalog and deleted database? https://t.co/vARnIqHoh4
@emilyakopp Are these authors “....knowingly assisting....” violation of the treaty (risking life sentence on conviction?)
I can't believe that 156 virologists signed off on this: "The lab-origin hypothesis suggests an accident at best or nefarious actors at the worst. At this time and based on the available data, there is no compelling evidence to support either of these lab-
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
RT @R_H_Ebright: Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
Link to virologists' letter: https://t.co/Zork018mfo
Virology under the Microscope-a Call for Rational Discourse https://t.co/zwBVIbzFKb
Virology under the Microscope-a Call for Rational Discourse https://t.co/M9lcYDk15Z #LongCovid #pwLC
Virology under the Microscope-a Call for Rational Discourse https://t.co/h2iO8jnw2a https://t.co/8Bs7FKDCbT