↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task…

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
122 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
Title
2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
Published in
Circulation, March 2017
DOI 10.1161/cir.0000000000000470
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie D. Gerhard-Herman, Heather L. Gornik, Coletta Barrett, Neal R. Barshes, Matthew A. Corriere, Douglas E. Drachman, Lee A. Fleisher, Francis Gerry R. Fowkes, Naomi M. Hamburg, Scott Kinlay, Robert Lookstein, Sanjay Misra, Leila Mureebe, Jeffrey W. Olin, Rajan A.G. Patel, Judith G. Regensteiner, Andres Schanzer, Mehdi H. Shishehbor, Kerry J. Stewart, Diane Treat-Jacobson, M. Eileen Walsh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 315 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Student > Master 39 12%
Other 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Other 91 29%
Unknown 31 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 176 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 56 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#84,390
of 15,148,324 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#288
of 16,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,530
of 288,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#18
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,148,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.