| Title |
Nonpharmaceutical Interventions for Pandemic Influenza, International Measures - Volume 12, Number 1—January 2006 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid1201.051370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Bell, Angus Nicoll, Keiji Fukuda, Peter Horby, Arnold Monto, Frederick Hayden, Clare Wylks, Lance Sanders, Jonathan Van Tam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 17% |
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Japan | 6 | 4% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 86 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 125 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 6% |
| Scientists | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 56 | 23% |
| Unknown | 63 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#213,134
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#353
of 9,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#403
of 175,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#16
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.