| Title |
High-throughput splicing assays identify missense and silent splice-disruptive POU1F1 variants underlying pituitary hormone deficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.06.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Gergics, Cathy Smith, Hironori Bando, Alexander A L Jorge, Denise Rockstroh-Lippold, Sebastian A Vishnopolska, Frederic Castinetti, Mariam Maksutova, Luciani Renata Silveira Carvalho, Julia Hoppmann, Julián Martínez Mayer, Frédérique Albarel, Debora Braslavsky, Ana Keselman, Ignacio Bergadá, Marcelo A Martí, Alexandru Saveanu, Anne Barlier, Rami Abou Jamra, Michael H Guo, Andrew Dauber, Marilena Nakaguma, Berenice B Mendonca, Sajini N Jayakody, A Bilge Ozel, Qing Fang, Qianyi Ma, Jun Z Li, Thierry Brue, María Ines Pérez Millán, Ivo J P Arnhold, Roland Pfaeffle, Jacob O Kitzman, Sally A Camper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 44% |
| Argentina | 3 | 11% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,179,620
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#636
of 5,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,906
of 448,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.