↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Prevalence of Immunosuppressive Drug Use Among Commercially Insured US Adults, 2018-2019

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
65 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 tweeters
Title
Prevalence of Immunosuppressive Drug Use Among Commercially Insured US Adults, 2018-2019
Published in
JAMA Network Open, May 2021
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4920
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth I. Wallace, Brooke Kenney, Preeti N. Malani, Daniel J. Clauw, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Akbar K. Waljee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 522. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#26,338
of 17,956,456 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#128
of 3,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#774
of 239,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#7
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,956,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.