↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
226 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method
Published in
Critical Care, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13054-021-03491-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prashant Nasa, Elie Azoulay, Ashish K. Khanna, Ravi Jain, Sachin Gupta, Yash Javeri, Deven Juneja, Pradeep Rangappa, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan, Waleed Alhazzani, Massimo Antonelli, Yaseen M. Arabi, Jan Bakker, Laurent J. Brochard, Adam M. Deane, Bin Du, Sharon Einav, Andrés Esteban, Ognjen Gajic, Samuel M. Galvagno, Claude Guérin, Samir Jaber, Gopi C. Khilnani, Younsuck Koh, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Flavia R. Machado, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Jordi Mancebo, Michael T. McCurdy, Brendan A. McGrath, Sangeeta Mehta, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Mervyn Mer, Michael Nurok, Pauline K. Park, Paolo Pelosi, John V. Peter, Jason Phua, David V. Pilcher, Lise Piquilloud, Peter Schellongowski, Marcus J. Schultz, Manu Shankar-Hari, Suveer Singh, Massimiliano Sorbello, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, Andrew A. Udy, Tobias Welte, Sheila N. Myatra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 21%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 21%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#147,383
of 17,630,293 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#61
of 5,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,236
of 334,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,630,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them