| Title |
Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03491-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prashant Nasa, Elie Azoulay, Ashish K. Khanna, Ravi Jain, Sachin Gupta, Yash Javeri, Deven Juneja, Pradeep Rangappa, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan, Waleed Alhazzani, Massimo Antonelli, Yaseen M. Arabi, Jan Bakker, Laurent J. Brochard, Adam M. Deane, Bin Du, Sharon Einav, Andrés Esteban, Ognjen Gajic, Samuel M. Galvagno, Claude Guérin, Samir Jaber, Gopi C. Khilnani, Younsuck Koh, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Flavia R. Machado, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Jordi Mancebo, Michael T. McCurdy, Brendan A. McGrath, Sangeeta Mehta, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Mervyn Mer, Michael Nurok, Pauline K. Park, Paolo Pelosi, John V. Peter, Jason Phua, David V. Pilcher, Lise Piquilloud, Peter Schellongowski, Marcus J. Schultz, Manu Shankar-Hari, Suveer Singh, Massimiliano Sorbello, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, Andrew A. Udy, Tobias Welte, Sheila N. Myatra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 213 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 26 | 12% |
| United States | 11 | 5% |
| Spain | 10 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 9 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Colombia | 7 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 88 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 167 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 13% |
| Scientists | 13 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 300 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Researcher | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 144 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 153 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#269,057
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#123
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,135
of 457,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.