| Title |
Donor to recipient transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 by lung transplantation despite negative donor upper respiratory tract testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Transplantation, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ajt.16532 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel R. Kaul, Andrew L. Valesano, Joshua G. Petrie, Rommel Sagana, Dennis Lyu, Jules Lin, Emily Stoneman, Lane M. Smith, Paul Lephart, Adam S. Lauring |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 625 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 106 | 17% |
| Canada | 34 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 5% |
| Japan | 27 | 4% |
| Australia | 14 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | 1% |
| Germany | 7 | 1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 45 | 7% |
| Unknown | 342 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 507 | 81% |
| Scientists | 53 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 50 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1765. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,917
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#3
of 5,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324
of 456,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#1
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.