↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Temporal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 mutation accumulation within and across infected hosts

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
147 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions
Title
Temporal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 mutation accumulation within and across infected hosts
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.19.427330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valesano, Andrew L., Rumfelt, Kalee E., Dimcheff, Derek E., Blair, Christopher N., Fitzsimmons, William J., Petrie, Joshua G., Martin, Emily T., Lauring, Adam S.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#296,607
of 17,695,296 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#2,061
of 120,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,491
of 338,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#166
of 8,201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,695,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.