↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

In vivo CGG repeat RNA binding protein capture identifies RAN translation modifiers and suppressors of repeat toxicity.

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
Title
In vivo CGG repeat RNA binding protein capture identifies RAN translation modifiers and suppressors of repeat toxicity.
Published in
bioRxiv, January 2021
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.08.425998
Authors

Malik, Indranil, Tseng, Yi-Ju, Wright, Shannon E., Zheng, Kristina, Ramaiyer, Prithika, Green, Katelyn M., Todd, Peter K., Indranil Malik, Yi-Ju Tseng, Shannon E. Wright, Kristina Zheng, Prithika Ramaiyer, Katelyn M. Green, Peter K. Todd

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,445,266
of 18,787,703 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#23,014
of 131,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,368
of 432,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1,343
of 8,081 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,787,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,081 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.