↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Risk Prediction for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy in Delivering Mothers: A Validated Risk Model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Risk Prediction for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy in Delivering Mothers: A Validated Risk Model
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Failure, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.12.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda B. Davis, Jennifer Jarvie, Ellise Gambahaya, JoAnn Lindenfeld, David Kao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Energy 1 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,057,420
of 17,388,379 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#74
of 1,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,379
of 393,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#7
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,388,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.