| Title |
Comprehensive public health evaluation of lockdown as a non-pharmaceutical intervention on COVID-19 spread in India: national trends masking state-level variations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041778 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxwell Salvatore, Deepankar Basu, Debashree Ray, Mike Kleinsasser, Soumik Purkayastha, Rupam Bhattacharyya, Bhramar Mukherjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 12 | 29% |
| United States | 8 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#955,174
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,664
of 25,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,990
of 525,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#43
of 799 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 799 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.