| Title |
First-attempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32532-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annery G Garcia-Marcinkiewicz, Pete G Kovatsis, Agnes I Hunyady, Patrick N Olomu, Bingqing Zhang, Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy, Adolfo Gonzalez, Siri Kanmanthreddy, Jorge A Gálvez, Amber M Franz, James Peyton, Raymond Park, Edgar E Kiss, David Sommerfield, Heather Griffis, Akira Nishisaki, Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg, Vinay M Nadkarni, Francis X McGowan, John E Fiadjoe, PeDI Collaborative investigators, David Ladner, Nicholas Burjek, Narasimhan Jagannathan, John Hadjuk, Saeedah Asaf, Chris Glover, Mary L Stein, Ramesh Kodavatiganti, B B Bruins, Brian Struyk, Luis Sequera-Ramos, Christopher Ward, Elizabeth Laverriere, Harshad Gurnaney, Eric Scheu, Heather Farrell, Paul Stricker, Pilar Castro, Angela Lee, Songyos Valairucha, Judit Szolnoki, Jennifer Zieg, Franklin B Chiao, Brad M Taicher, Jurgen C De Graaff, Nicholas M Dalesio, Robert S Greenberg, Angela R Lucero, Lillian Zamora, Allison Fernandez, Nada Mohamed, Stefano C Sabato, Christopher D Holmes, Somaletha T Bhattacharya, Jonathan Meserve, Paul I Reynolds, Bishr Haydar, Monica Weber, Megan Therrian, Martina Richtsfeld, Mark S Teen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 17% |
| Australia | 14 | 9% |
| France | 8 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 106 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 20% |
| Scientists | 17 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#380,722
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,807
of 43,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,624
of 529,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#96
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.