| Title |
Glycine-based treatment ameliorates NAFLD by modulating fatty acid oxidation, glutathione synthesis, and the gut microbiome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Translational Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz2841 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oren Rom, Yuhao Liu, Zhipeng Liu, Ying Zhao, Jianfeng Wu, Alia Ghrayeb, Luis Villacorta, Yanbo Fan, Lin Chang, Lu Wang, Cai Liu, Dongshan Yang, Jun Song, Jason C Rech, Yanhong Guo, Huilun Wang, Guizhen Zhao, Wenying Liang, Yui Koike, Haocheng Lu, Tomonari Koike, Tony Hayek, Subramaniam Pennathur, Chuanwu Xi, Bo Wen, Duxin Sun, Minerva T Garcia-Barrio, Michael Aviram, Eyal Gottlieb, Inbal Mor, Wanqing Liu, Jifeng Zhang, Y Eugene Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 61% |
| Scientists | 16 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#834,060
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#1,864
of 5,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,798
of 528,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#45
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.