@krazykitkatm @j_avalonclinic @Scary7Dr Are you really not aware of how the industry designs a study to fail, even if they're poising people in doing so? Yet another example: https://t.co/10mdB7um67 This isn't science, it's gatekeeping. Actual discovery
@PecanC8 Hydroxychloroquine is about as effective as placebo as a treatment for Covid. Below is a randomized, peer-reviewed clinical trial that proves it. I welcome any randomized, peer-reviewed clinical trials you might provide that refute those findings.
@Progressiefblng @ErikGeenen @Nieuwsblad_be https://t.co/9lbKcOEda2 Among 479 patients who were randomized; 20.1% in the intensive care unit; 46.8% receiving supplemental oxygen without positive pressure; 11.5% receiving noninvasive ventilation or nasal hi
https://t.co/9lbKcOEda2 "Among 479 patients who were randomized; 20.1% in the intensive care unit; 46.8% receiving supplemental oxygen without positive pressure; 11.5% receiving noninvasive ventilation or nasal high-flow oxygen; and 6.7% receiving invasive
@IanCopeland5 ”There is no credible evidence that HCQ results in worsening of COVID-19.” Unless of course, this new study you quoted (and every other one w/ neg results) cherry picked and hellbent to prove it doesn’t work from the get go. The key is early.
@CKellyUAP Maybe you should advocate for placebos covid treatmen as they as effective as HCQ https://t.co/e32peiadSU
@FnqSilver @_johnbye https://t.co/GC10WDJv8F It didn't help with clinical improvement.
@FnqSilver @_johnbye https://t.co/DKmJEL0BPG vs an RCT.
@Marfisa2 @Franco_Aspes @Bluefidel47 Non fatti coi dovuti metodi?!? Anche irial randomizzati? https://t.co/PZ0rBRFEkG https://t.co/VM8qd7F061 https://t.co/nsheoYyLun https://t.co/gtag02cjv7 https://t.co/G5CkC7kB6T https://t.co/QKYZbpeNBI Qui recente metana
@NobodyHadToDie @Lat1944 @Wonderfuldayz @stkirsch In a randomized trial conducted at 34 hospitals in the US between April 2 and June 19, 2020, outcome did not differ between the HCQ and placebo groups. Death: HCQ=25 (10.4%) Placebo=25 (10.6%) https://t.c
@allenf32 And another: https://t.co/tvnXebtr2r
@Danstringer74 https://t.co/ZrjK2damFx https://t.co/95H2nY2k7v https://t.co/JIx8bEXfJA a few studies that more or less show it was essentially useless in treating covid (unfortunately)
@MarkWar16520311 Yep. In a randomized trial conducted at 34 hospitals in the US between April 2, 2020 and June 19, 2020, HCQ treatment outcome did not differ from placebo groups. Deaths: N= 242/237 (HCQ/Placebo) HCQ=25 (10.4%) Placebo=25 (10.6%) https:/
@brismich1 @mum89000 @MartinZ_uncut @aphm_actu 📌Mitja (BCN PEP-COV2) = https://t.co/fhzGSS8wSy 📌Skipper (COVID-PEP) = https://t.co/gsTjgffNMa 📌Self (ORCHID)= https://t.co/MOPGlscUb3 📌Cavalcanti (Coalition I) = https://t.co/TwPZgzewkB 📌Horby et al, 2020
@escapedahfate @JoshEakle Can you back it up with sound double blind and independently confirmed studies? https://t.co/1Uao10jyij
@BorgerPieter Nog meer bewijs dat HCQ niet werkt tegen covid19: https://t.co/r8xOnCqADF https://t.co/xWG7Nc8gCo
@NoToAllGMOs @StevenDaw5 @Blucollarp8riot @TimSelf19 @Generali11 @VigilantFox 'These findings do not support the use of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 among hospitalized adults.' (2020) https://t.co/3iQVuu3TCG
@MathsPlusPlus @maosbot The following link fixes JAMA's position on "hydroxychloroquine" efficacy: https://t.co/dGZFQWqmt4 Same junk science; different pathological editorial board willing to endorse an obvious lie given that HCQ would've stopped the pret
@prolifrantivaxr @ianfmusgrave @CKellyUAP On clinical trials. It hasn't shown to be effective. https://t.co/l2cZmkV0zC
@jaeger7575 @raitt_amanda @AnnadeBuisseret Literal RCT trials done on HCQ and it found it doesn’t work on Covid-19. This trial is referenced on the NIH website. https://t.co/rH8yLGEAdj
@RepMTG Here's another answer for you. This should save you the trouble of asking. https://t.co/XPztk3E7jx
@TVA_Poubelle @Schnuppe100 @GeneviveGauvre1 @LeDroitca https://t.co/6OkZRQTmmp Among adults hospitalized with respiratory illness from COVID-19, treatment with hydroxychloroquine, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve clinical status at day
@34sweetnessfan @TheRightMelissa @elonmusk @stella_immanuel You haven't done research. You've read and watched other peoples opinions. How many research studies have you read and understood? https://t.co/DV6BZp4yCM
@youxknowit @jerryfarman @JohnnyQuachy @davidzweig You mean these peer reviewed studies here that show you are the one making up lies after 2 years? Yes, you can find these studies yourself. I see you don't bother too, however. https://t.co/rlZbBQkDeT
@KTDorosh @Nate64371511 @elonmusk @TomFitton @Twitter @realDonaldTrump Did not qualify. https://t.co/QfzadjV9Qc
@JohnVan62654549 @truth_rooted @kylenabecker HCQ was shut down because there wasn't enough evidence to suggest it was a suggestive treatment. https://t.co/bOZ6qnybhn
@Trplb2 @kylenabecker ...suggested it was effective, and several saying the opposite. However, there are some individually reported cases of HCQ causing improvement. https://t.co/bOZ6qnybhn
@nowwhatsthat @StatisticsBC @AB_MD_WarRoom The CDC looked at this, and said NOPE https://t.co/3niCe4YfVZ The FDA: NOPE https://t.co/Nuns3wHIDk JAMA said NOPE https://t.co/PUBj9fJPTX New England Journal of Medicine: NOPE https://t.co/uCd5DwXtD4 2/3
@Ch786Harris @Dahlialien @ObeyYourMans As for Hydroxy Massively higher patient count, hydroxy associated with increased mortality: https://t.co/aKQImswEsA No association: https://t.co/tNdtA7y6mM No association: https://t.co/ICginhtKiK No association: https
@JamieBullard18 @PaulMitchell_AB Also : https://t.co/rBSuCxQb6e Best not to dwell on MSM, get your science from the source. I don't recommend spending time watching MSM.
@jsdarkwing @rush_nut Misdirection. Peer-reviewed research on this is quite clear. Here's another study showing HCQ is useless. https://t.co/VfUGi1rwoL
@The_Hod_Cast The vax works for adults. https://t.co/JsTB1wyq1Z
@wef_suomi @Gunnar_Forsgren @SenRonJohnson I wonder if there's a risk that the authors of the study might be cherrypicking studies that show benefits associated with HCQ in treating covid. This study seems to conclude otherwise. https://t.co/2V4v7sqaYi
@DanyTami31 @REnsembleJMV @ch_coulon @papanours60 Des articles dans des revues spécialisées ? Mais bien sur, il y a plein d'essais clinique de publiés. TOUS conclut que l'HCQ ou l'IVM ne servent à rien contre le Covid, ni en préventif ni en curatif http
@EdwardBernays10 @obourdais @wargonm Et un autre https://t.co/ZwKm1aWJAA
@ERF0207 @noxidls @wilburswormhole @mildanalyst "These findings do not support the use of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 among hospitalized adults" https://t.co/a4yEmssuaB
@LamarcusTrammel @LJBarre @pilotswife6 @cwietz1 @zap_lock @drdagly Do you have evidence? Because you appear to of been fooled again. https://t.co/EPytSreeNs
@zwarteaap "These findings do not support the use of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 among hospitalized adults." https://t.co/dL5fFtSEu6
@BarnettforAZ @DougDucey Here’s another: 10.4% mortality v. 10.6% mortality https://t.co/O622ylXv8M
@Texas68Landon @SeriusBall @PatWay1979 I’m glad you didn’t die. As someone that works in an ED, I see you didn’t specify what job, you would know that Covid outcomes can be completely random. I would love to see a study supporting your findings. I’m sure y
@GelinasJesus @Commander__Keen @ralfisius @LussiD @fgagnon5 https://t.co/6OkZRQTmmp Fonctionne pas
@richardursomd @JohnCounts Just gonna drop this here. Maybe even an ophthalmologist can understand it. https://t.co/AUJPpSmJpc
RT @GPR109A: @YouKnow_78 Just like Gilead did with HCQ for Remdesivir #TheBioharmaSwindleForDummies 👇
こちらの記事は? 有用ではなかったと結論づける??? ファクトチェッカーさん?雇われて報酬がないと動かないのですか?
@Shenanigan1111 @Anne_Wamai @OTURISK Your cognitive dissonance is showing. Dismissing controlled studies is the first symptom of a delusion. How about JAMA? A randomized trial at 34 US hospitals - no difference between HCQ and placebo groups. Deaths: HC
@IkNet @RoyM25373641 @John69785696 @blckbxnews Meaning These findings do not support the use of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 among hospitalized adults. https://t.co/Ub7gCMKqOW
@c00p_s @QQHaseena @Arnodg En OUD!! En zelfs de auteurs gebruiken het niet! https://t.co/Gdle2RrI4h
@kaceysharon @Babydoll921961 @Covid19Critical Sure https://t.co/eIhb2PDxnt Use it in whichever way you want. Either to support your views or maybe to see that there is more in this s.....t than meets the eye.
@AesBrah @AdamALang @PierreKory @AesBrah Yes in RCTs we trust, especially in those with direct funding from big pharma like this one on off patent HCQ (Roche, Glaxo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Bayer & many others) Yet somehow, JAMA didn't think ther
@drbeen_medical Wow. Is this the same Eli Lilly (among other pharmas like Roche- tocilizumab people), which gave private grants to dr Park and others drs conducting RCT on hydroxychloroquine which JAMA published on 09.11.2020 and trashed HCQ? Yes, nothing
RT @Alaiacin: @InangBayan10 It’s like that…. https://t.co/3TZdzWcNxo
RT @Alaiacin: @InangBayan10 It’s like that…. https://t.co/3TZdzWcNxo
@Zenon71647295 @giranthon @Christi67158123 INSTRUISEZ VOUS! Etudes RANDOMISEES : 4 / 15 https://t.co/rnZk3Nw4R0 https://t.co/F2NZsyGJZV https://t.co/XuOaOG0eRZ https://t.co/MTNenD3saR
@marcellotoa @NicolasMauduit @Nain_Portekoi 📌Abella (PATCH = https://t.co/KHH92IXlg8 📌Barnabas= https://t.co/XpSOKQ7jdZ 📌Mitja (BCN PEP-COV2) = https://t.co/fhzGSS8wSy 📌Skipper (COVID-PEP) = https://t.co/gsTjgffNMa 📌Self (ORCHID)= https://t.co/MOPGlscU
RT @Daoyu15: @Greg21143362 https://t.co/5VuFqSijfv https://t.co/R0YmWMsOx3 https://t.co/TzDhX9nDHi that came from an extensive cell culture…
RT @Daoyu15: @Greg21143362 https://t.co/5VuFqSijfv https://t.co/R0YmWMsOx3 https://t.co/TzDhX9nDHi that came from an extensive cell culture…
@a_bbound @tysonzahner Zinc was always the antiviral and HCQ was the ionophore that facilitates zinc uptake in the cells. So any study that fails to use HCQ in combination with Zinc is destined to fail (here's one good example - https://t.co/iXjmJW4d6b)
@MMeBlackSheep @l_extracteur Commençons par la plus grosse. Self et Al (2020) https://t.co/hkqBqMLr0o Les résultats ordinaux stratifiés sont fournis à J14 mais pas à J28. 1/n
"Among adults hospitalized with respiratory illness from COVID-19, treatment with hydroxychloroquine, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve clinical status at day 14." https://t.co/JKpNetIm4E
@tacprc1 @thevivafrei @melaniejoly You can find dozens of studies saying this from reputable scientists. https://t.co/5PSnDHCKrv https://t.co/I8kJ20WwGb
@JessicaCarmod10 @deviedot @beverleyturner @Peston https://t.co/dMM4IeGHBi "...no antiviral activity for hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-231,32 and open-label pragmatic trials in the United Kingdom33 and Brazil34 suggesting no clinical benefit."
@resarfekim @DannyAlberta77 Although I'll read this one, I was actually thinking of this. https://t.co/BaFfoIthNt
@canyon_free @sorrow79 @mtgreenee Here is a fifth study with 480 more examples of the ineffectiveness of HCQ. Why is this one silly, exactly? https://t.co/gsWydVYqDb
@canyon_free @sorrow79 @mtgreenee You are right. I was trying your way of arguing. Fact free claims with no evidence. It was ironic how you asked for evidence from me for my claims and you still cannot support your claims. His own paper says the effec
@joe_shipman @filipe_rafaeli Has the author also googled "statistical evidence against Hydroxychloroquine"? JAMA: https://t.co/Db9xTwDVlf… Nature: https://t.co/cqFxwoyjJ7… etc..
@Donboyyers @Joycex1 @TheFriar1966 @iamzero @Doc_Box Je bent niet echt bij de tijd. Van oktober vorig jaar en geen RCT. Klinische onderzoeken (RCTs) hebben onomstotelijk vastgesteld dat antivirale werking van HCQ te gering is om het in te kunnen zetten al
@Akcita1 @zhiyanle @pathogenetics Ok "I do my own research guy", this is how we have so many morons believing the earth is flat. There is a reason why no 1st world country uses it as treatment. But you be you. https://t.co/1aP8x0I3ph https://t.co/yFw4XpIyw
@Lynn02124 @theliamnissan @FoxNews 3. Here is an actual clinical trial (not an observational study) go ahead and "do your own research" see what you find https://t.co/NcDMIZUZ6T
@RCannon86 @drnickgreiner @PhilHollowayEsq Here is a high quality study: https://t.co/x6hMrNfEPK and it doesn't show the efficacy of HCQ. At least in hospitalized patients with Covid-19, HCQ "did not work".
@Gloryscope @sarahbeth345 @AZDeploralove Hydroxychloroquine doesn't cure COVID, as studies have shown again and again. https://t.co/mn20JqnlsQ
@ReasorReid @mcfunny @MdRisette @Awithonelison @MaryBro01132873 @RWMaloneMD Nice moving the goalpost to more pseudoscience. There were 34 hospitals across the US in that trial. https://t.co/H9TEtYyrjC
@RaphaoMarshall Só pra deixar aqui, caso alguém se interesse por um RCT de respeito sobre cloroquina: https://t.co/OEoP4JhHfk