| Title |
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy–Associated Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.120.048100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarju Ganatra, Robert Redd, Salim S. Hayek, Rohan Parikh, Tariq Azam, Gregory A. Yanik, Lauren Spendley, Sarah Nikiforow, Caron Jacobson, Anju Nohria |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 53% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 68% |
| Scientists | 13 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#949,664
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#2,372
of 21,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,079
of 440,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#91
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.