↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Jointly defining cell types from multiple single-cell datasets using LIGER

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 tweeters
Title
Jointly defining cell types from multiple single-cell datasets using LIGER
Published in
Nature Protocols, October 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41596-020-0391-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jialin Liu, Chao Gao, Joshua Sodicoff, Velina Kozareva, Evan Z. Macosko, Joshua D. Welch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2020.
All research outputs
#699,665
of 16,089,226 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#163
of 2,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,947
of 223,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,089,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.