↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Cultural complications: Why, how, and lessons learned

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Surgery, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Cultural complications: Why, how, and lessons learned
Published in
American Journal of Surgery, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelsea A. Harris, Justin B. Dimick, Lesly A. Dossett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,195,894
of 16,081,181 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Surgery
#294
of 3,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,981
of 239,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Surgery
#12
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,081,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.