↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Microengineered 3D pulmonary interstitial mimetics highlight a critical role for matrix degradation in myofibroblast differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
61 tweeters
Title
Microengineered 3D pulmonary interstitial mimetics highlight a critical role for matrix degradation in myofibroblast differentiation
Published in
Science Advances, September 2020
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abb5069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel L. Matera, Katarina M. DiLillo, Makenzee R. Smith, Christopher D. Davidson, Ritika Parikh, Mohammed Said, Carole A. Wilke, Isabelle M. Lombaert, Kelly B. Arnold, Bethany B. Moore, Brendon M. Baker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#241,707
of 15,922,988 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#1,505
of 5,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,596
of 220,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#84
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 116.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.