@Ben_garrod @jurassicg1rl why does 'plant thing' always sound like cheek when it's from you BG?! ;) Last Glacial Max is more of a mud thing .... this is a good place to start - nice map with ranges on spatially for temp at the LGM (fig 2) . https://t.co/A
@ZawiszaZly @jakubwiech Ze strony Uniwersytetu w Arizonie, od współautorki tekstu opublikowanego w Nature. A co? https://t.co/69RhULcBkO https://t.co/BOEM9ph3JV
@AlexUnChileno @niko_prieto1 @bakalaofresco La última glaciación, 6-8ºC con niveles de CO2 de 180ppm, hoy hay 415ppm. https://t.co/MZ12xnHted Aquí tienes una fuente, un estudio de Nature con referencias de otros 79 estudios. Una de las más prestigiosas rev
@PJMacha @DaleGribble_666 @DrInsensitive @TonyClimate @NOAA The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences;
RT @PCarterClimate: PALEO-CLIMATE COOLING CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 3.4C Last Glacial Maximum, best to investigate how climate responds Translate…
RT @PCarterClimate: PALEO-CLIMATE COOLING CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 3.4C Last Glacial Maximum, best to investigate how climate responds Translate…
RT @PCarterClimate: PALEO-CLIMATE COOLING CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 3.4C Last Glacial Maximum, best to investigate how climate responds Translate…
RT @PCarterClimate: PALEO-CLIMATE COOLING CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 3.4C Last Glacial Maximum, best to investigate how climate responds Translate…
RT @PCarterClimate: PALEO-CLIMATE COOLING CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 3.4C Last Glacial Maximum, best to investigate how climate responds Translate…
RT @PCarterClimate: PALEO-CLIMATE COOLING CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 3.4C Last Glacial Maximum, best to investigate how climate responds Translate…
PALEO-CLIMATE COOLING CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 3.4C Last Glacial Maximum, best to investigate how climate responds Translates to climate sensitivity 3.4 Celsius. Confirms latest IPCC AR6 models 3.8°C Was downgraded to 3C as 1990 https://t.co/bOvLS0WJzg #climat
@BigJoeBastardi The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different f
@AintaBotIamReal @AndrsCh92256946 @Miss_Bennet5 @perezreverte La sensibilidad, una vez más, se ha calculado de multiples formas, por ejemplo a partir de los datos del ultimo máximo glaciar. https://t.co/VgflCrtVzK
@GrahamLKeegan The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different fr
@Albert00278568 @JMGJurado Sensibilidad climatica https://t.co/VgflCrtVzK
@didaskeptic @DaleGribble_666 The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6
@didaskeptic The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different from
@Mark__Mazur @GrahamLKeegan @ClimateRealists The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally,
@latimeralder The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different fro
@cole_davesc66 @ProfMarkMaslin The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6
@Lyndonx @ProfMarkMaslin The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C di
RT @priscian: @JunkScience The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily tem…
@JunkScience The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different from
@MikeMen2017 @ZLabe The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C differe
@olivier_chanson Die Daten stammen aus dem neuen IPCC-Bericht, in den die Ergebnisse diverser Studien eingeflossen sind. z.B. https://t.co/GsNbMoT7Of
@latimeralder The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different fro
@ScrootyB @ChristianHJW Man kann natürlich auch selbst die Rohdaten analysieren, aber von den Kenntnissen gehe ich aus Erfahrung nicht aus. Trotzdem verlinke ich hier mal ein paar: https://t.co/IVV4qRA0f0 https://t.co/NLigdbMu69 https://t.co/X7SLIcPn1l htt
@Arron_banks The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different from
@MiddleClassJeff @JunkScience The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6
@latimeralder The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different fro
@ItsTheAtmospher @latimeralder The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6
@latimeralder The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different fro
@latimeralder The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different fro
@latimeralder @ItsTheAtmospher The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6
RT @priscian: @latimeralder @ItsTheAtmospher The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller th…
@latimeralder @ItsTheAtmospher The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6
@ClimateRealists The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different
@JunkScience @wattsupwiththat The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6
@MatthewWielicki @TheClimateHawk The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~
@MrSandSGB The range & uncertainty of large-scale or global average temperatures (GAT) is much smaller than local daily temp fluctuations, so small changes in GAT can lead to large climatic differences; e.g. globally, we're only ~ 6 °C different from t
@weather_buffalo A comment for onlookers who might be thinking in terms of daily temperature fluctuations: global *average* temps are much more constrained, & small changes there imply large local effects; e.g. the last glacial peak was globally about
@MatthewWielicki The last glacial maximum (LGM) was ~ 6 °C colder globally than now: Tierney &al 2020 https://t.co/KxCSg8b5PL https://t.co/oxmXaR38SK
@Lobo67383079 @pmagn @newscientist and for all that you also find papers which play the ball to lower site paleo: https://t.co/JlGCn9A6rT aerosols: https://t.co/G9t1jr6v6m clouds: https://t.co/opqAqBzg4x
@Climate_Cassie @_____Rhiannon @extremetemps 🤔 Doctorate in what now?
@ClimateOfGavin @RealClimate @AndrewDessler wasn't there a run of "LGM wasn't that cold" (especially in the tropics) papers caused by sub-optimal model use of proxy data? Schmittner et al 2011 but others too? seemingly put to bed by Tierney et al 2020 ht
@HalleenJouni @ER_Korhola tässä vielä suora linkki siihen Nature -julkaisuun https://t.co/sTqN738CPH
@JosJulinCalvo @ManoloE27297911 @ierrejon En serio? No se podía saber...sabes que utilizamos esas glaciaciones para estudiar la sensibilidad climática de la Tierra al calentamiento por la quema de combustibles fósiles? Por ejemplo, este paper de Nature ht
@kaoryu LGM論文が出た時もですが、1万年以上前にデータ同化を適用した例が現状ほとんどないので、natureとかに通っちゃうのですよね。数年後には、各国モデルの結果が段々出てくると期待してますが・・・(日本はたぶん私がやらねばならない https://t.co/Hzegu6LCgD
@10kClimate Again, no citations on your part? https://t.co/Fw4zBTHeTt
@10kClimate Still no actual paper citations from solid journals on your part? https://t.co/Fw4zBTHeTt
@10kClimate You're welcome to note and to cite key papers I've referred to some of these https://t.co/Y1qgVuRLtX https://t.co/cBWkp4wpCL https://t.co/XbbS5fmVH0 https://t.co/UpHLlvbe5j https://t.co/SMI9YuaAc8 https://t.co/BZQalkWNR9 https://t.co/PJpjfbD29
RT @KenCaldeira: It would be interesting to apply their approach to the ~6 C of warming that followed the last glacial maximum, a period th…
It would be interesting to apply their approach to the ~6 C of warming that followed the last glacial maximum, a period that is largely devoid of widespread extinction in the marine environment. https://t.co/u4M706HOvU
RT @leafwax: @neilhalloran @hausfath @xkcd @ClimateOfGavin Last year we published a new estimate of LGM cooling - 6C. The LGMR revises this…
RT @leafwax: @neilhalloran @hausfath @xkcd @ClimateOfGavin Last year we published a new estimate of LGM cooling - 6C. The LGMR revises this…
@neilhalloran @hausfath @xkcd @ClimateOfGavin Last year we published a new estimate of LGM cooling - 6C. The LGMR revises this to 6.8C + a maximum cooling of 7C near 17,500 years ago. Older estimates of 3-4C are not accurate, so yes the xkcd curve should b
@magotefarmer @yasyasminn @rafa_scotini @_absalazar @Astronomiaum Um site da nasa agora virou videozinho de propaganda beleza, quer informações científicas? Tem aqui e fico a https://t.co/8gEyHd683O https://t.co/UuSij5eE7T https://t.co/sBlcVJiITB https
Hopefully we are not underestimating compounding warming effects. If we experienced ~6.1 C warming since LGM from 180 ppm to 280 ppm. Where are we with full effects at 420 ppm? Or AGGI of 504 ppm? See https://t.co/04FX6j2co3 and https://t.co/B32YnvEnOr @d
RT @leafwax: Shameless plug! My research group contributed to this by publishing a new estimate of cooling and climate sensitivity during t…
RT @leafwax: Shameless plug! My research group contributed to this by publishing a new estimate of cooling and climate sensitivity during t…
@HugoGonzalez_94 @DcgDidi @olimpia_epiro Ya sé que la realidad te importa un pepino, pero otros al menos verán tu ignorancia. Te vuelvo a repetir, usamos los cambios pasados para estimar la magnitud del cambio global presente. Ya sé que es como mandarte al
RT @leafwax: Shameless plug! My research group contributed to this by publishing a new estimate of cooling and climate sensitivity during t…
RT @leafwax: Shameless plug! My research group contributed to this by publishing a new estimate of cooling and climate sensitivity during t…
@apayno4 Puede leer por ejemplo https://t.co/VgflCrLwri
RT @leafwax: Shameless plug! My research group contributed to this by publishing a new estimate of cooling and climate sensitivity during t…
RT @leafwax: Shameless plug! My research group contributed to this by publishing a new estimate of cooling and climate sensitivity during t…