| Title |
Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis of Colon Cancer Cell Response to 5-Fluorouracil-Induced DNA Damage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sung Rye Park, Sim Namkoong, Leon Friesen, Chun-Seok Cho, Zac Zezhi Zhang, Yu-Chih Chen, Euisik Yoon, Chang H. Kim, Hojoong Kwak, Hyun Min Kang, Jun Hee Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| Italy | 2 | 11% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#566,570
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#1,177
of 12,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,282
of 426,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#24
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.