↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

The Effect of Advances in Lung-Cancer Treatment on Population Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
312 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
The Effect of Advances in Lung-Cancer Treatment on Population Mortality
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2020
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1916623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia Howlader, Gonçalo Forjaz, Meghan J. Mooradian, Rafael Meza, Chung Yin Kong, Kathleen A. Cronin, Angela B. Mariotto, Douglas R. Lowy, Eric J. Feuer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 312 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 656. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,318
of 15,926,394 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#656
of 27,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#978
of 292,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#41
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,926,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.