↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Exercise Promotes Healthy Aging of Skeletal Muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 2,026)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1284 tweeters
facebook
27 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
Title
Exercise Promotes Healthy Aging of Skeletal Muscle
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory D. Cartee, Russell T. Hepple, Marcas M. Bamman, Juleen R. Zierath

Abstract

Primary aging is the progressive and inevitable process of bodily deterioration during adulthood. In skeletal muscle, primary aging causes defective mitochondrial energetics and reduced muscle mass. Secondary aging refers to additional deleterious structural and functional age-related changes caused by diseases and lifestyle factors. Secondary aging can exacerbate deficits in mitochondrial function and muscle mass, concomitant with the development of skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Exercise opposes deleterious effects of secondary aging by preventing the decline in mitochondrial respiration, mitigating aging-related loss of muscle mass and enhancing insulin sensitivity. This review focuses on mechanisms by which exercise promotes "healthy aging" by inducing modifications in skeletal muscle.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,284 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 239 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 18%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Unspecified 21 8%
Other 76 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 20%
Unspecified 33 13%
Sports and Recreations 29 11%
Other 36 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 659. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,796
of 12,374,984 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#27
of 2,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#458
of 269,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,374,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.