↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Genetics, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
266 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research
Published in
Nature Reviews Genetics, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41576-020-0257-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Brian Byrd, Anna C. Greene, Deepashree Venkatesh Prasad, Xiaoqian Jiang, Casey S. Greene

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 266 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#126,845
of 15,922,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#73
of 2,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,343
of 290,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.