| Title |
Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Genetics, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41576-020-0257-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Brian Byrd, Anna C. Greene, Deepashree Venkatesh Prasad, Xiaoqian Jiang, Casey S. Greene |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 257 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 62 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 7% |
| Canada | 15 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| China | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 95 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 134 | 52% |
| Scientists | 112 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#282,348
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#120
of 2,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,915
of 432,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.