↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Coupling of translation quality control and mRNA targeting to stress granules

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
Title
Coupling of translation quality control and mRNA targeting to stress granules
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, June 2020
DOI 10.1083/jcb.202004120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie L. Moon, Tatsuya Morisaki, Timothy J. Stasevich, Roy Parker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#631,214
of 15,606,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#301
of 10,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,733
of 285,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#18
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.