| Title |
cIMPACT‐NOW update 7: advancing the molecular classification of ependymal tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Pathology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bpa.12866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David W. Ellison, Kenneth D. Aldape, David Capper, Maryam Fouladi, Mark R. Gilbert, Richard J. Gilbertson, Cynthia Hawkins, Thomas E. Merchant, Kristian Pajtler, Sriram Venneti, David N. Louis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 24% |
| India | 14 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Turkey | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 61% |
| Scientists | 18 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 61 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#499,150
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Brain Pathology
#12
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,613
of 435,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Pathology
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.