↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Palliative Care and Surgical Training

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
80 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Palliative Care and Surgical Training
Published in
Annals of Surgery, May 2016
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000001779
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wancata, Lauren M., Hinshaw, Daniel B., Suwanabol, Pasithorn A., Lauren M. Wancata, Daniel B. Hinshaw, Pasithorn A. Suwanabol, Hinshaw, Daniel B.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#236,756
of 10,700,282 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#195
of 5,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,768
of 277,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#18
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,700,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.