↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Integrated multi-omics approaches to improve classification of chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Nephrology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Integrated multi-omics approaches to improve classification of chronic kidney disease
Published in
Nature Reviews Nephrology, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41581-020-0286-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean Eddy, Laura H. Mariani, Matthias Kretzler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,997,650
of 15,148,160 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Nephrology
#533
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,533
of 153,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Nephrology
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,148,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.