| Title |
Antibiotics can be used to contain drug-resistant bacteria by maintaining sufficiently large sensitive populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000713 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elsa Hansen, Jason Karslake, Robert J. Woods, Andrew F. Read, Kevin B. Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 27% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 57% |
| Scientists | 31 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#823,520
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#1,483
of 9,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,905
of 424,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#24
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.