↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Flattening the curve in COVID-19 using personalised protective equipment: lessons from air pollution

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
Title
Flattening the curve in COVID-19 using personalised protective equipment: lessons from air pollution
Published in
Heart, May 2020
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjay Rajagopalan, Sui Huang, Robert D Brook

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,315,063
of 15,807,449 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#749
of 4,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,916
of 283,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#25
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,807,449 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.