↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 4,007)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
220 tweeters
patent
5 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
593 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
574 Mendeley
Title
Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70121-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatimah S Dawood, A Danielle Iuliano, Carrie Reed, Martin I Meltzer, David K Shay, Po-Yung Cheng, Don Bandaranayake, Robert F Breiman, W Abdullah Brooks, Philippe Buchy, Daniel R Feikin, Karen B Fowler, Aubree Gordon, Nguyen Tran Hien, Peter Horby, Q Sue Huang, Mark A Katz, Anand Krishnan, Renu Lal, Joel M Montgomery, Kåre Mølbak, Richard Pebody, Anne M Presanis, Hugo Razuri, Anneke Steens, Yeny O Tinoco, Jacco Wallinga, Hongjie Yu, Sirenda Vong, Joseph Bresee, Marc-Alain Widdowson

Abstract

18,500 laboratory-confirmed deaths caused by the 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 were reported worldwide for the period April, 2009, to August, 2010. This number is likely to be only a fraction of the true number of the deaths associated with 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1. We aimed to estimate the global number of deaths during the first 12 months of virus circulation in each country.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Hong Kong 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 536 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 21%
Researcher 111 19%
Student > Master 91 16%
Student > Bachelor 71 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 107 19%
Unknown 46 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 47 8%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Other 97 17%
Unknown 72 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 740. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,992
of 14,570,742 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#27
of 4,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 123,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,570,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.