↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
97 news outlets
blogs
19 blogs
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
374 X users
patent
20 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1019 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1042 Mendeley
Title
Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, June 2012
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70121-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatimah S Dawood, A Danielle Iuliano, Carrie Reed, Martin I Meltzer, David K Shay, Po-Yung Cheng, Don Bandaranayake, Robert F Breiman, W Abdullah Brooks, Philippe Buchy, Daniel R Feikin, Karen B Fowler, Aubree Gordon, Nguyen Tran Hien, Peter Horby, Q Sue Huang, Mark A Katz, Anand Krishnan, Renu Lal, Joel M Montgomery, Kåre Mølbak, Richard Pebody, Anne M Presanis, Hugo Razuri, Anneke Steens, Yeny O Tinoco, Jacco Wallinga, Hongjie Yu, Sirenda Vong, Joseph Bresee, Marc-Alain Widdowson

Abstract

18,500 laboratory-confirmed deaths caused by the 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 were reported worldwide for the period April, 2009, to August, 2010. This number is likely to be only a fraction of the true number of the deaths associated with 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1. We aimed to estimate the global number of deaths during the first 12 months of virus circulation in each country.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 374 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,042 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Hong Kong 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1008 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 166 16%
Researcher 162 16%
Student > Master 142 14%
Student > Bachelor 118 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 5%
Other 180 17%
Unknown 221 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 202 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 98 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 70 7%
Social Sciences 37 4%
Other 207 20%
Unknown 272 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#11,933
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#76
of 6,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 177,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#2
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.