↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Does Bone Plug and Graft Orientation (Inferior Versus Posterior) Alter Native Femoral Footprint Coverage in Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Overview of attention for article published in Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Does Bone Plug and Graft Orientation (Inferior Versus Posterior) Alter Native Femoral Footprint Coverage in Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
Published in
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asheesh Bedi, Alexander E. Weber, Nicholas A. Trasolini, Eric N. Mayer, Ioanna K. Bolia, John Higgins, Jason Hamamoto, Brian J. Cole, Bernard R. Bach, Nikhil N. Verma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,719,629
of 15,629,452 outputs
Outputs from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#462
of 3,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,371
of 256,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#24
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,629,452 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.