↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Improving the Residency Application and Selection Process

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
169 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
Improving the Residency Application and Selection Process
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2020
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.21212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maya M. Hammoud, John Andrews, Susan E. Skochelak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#119,450
of 14,370,149 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,210
of 26,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,974
of 193,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#71
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,370,149 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.