| Title |
Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1148/radiol.2019192094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew S Davenport, Mark A Perazella, Jerry Yee, Jonathan R Dillman, Derek Fine, Robert J McDonald, Roger A Rodby, Carolyn L Wang, Jeffrey C Weinreb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 562 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 183 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 4% |
| Spain | 24 | 4% |
| Mexico | 17 | 3% |
| Canada | 17 | 3% |
| India | 12 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 9 | 2% |
| Colombia | 7 | 1% |
| Germany | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 82 | 15% |
| Unknown | 179 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 310 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 173 | 31% |
| Scientists | 61 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 339 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 22% |
| Unknown | 110 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 172 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 118 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 459. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#60,622
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#81
of 10,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,469
of 481,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#6
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.