↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Differentiation of Cardiac Masses by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
130 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Differentiation of Cardiac Masses by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s12410-019-9522-4
Authors

Purvi Parwani, Michael Co, Tushar Ramesh, Nausheen Akhter, Cezar Iliescu, Nicolas Palaskas, Peter Kim, Greg Gladish, Jadranka Stojanovska, Dmitry Abramov, Juan Lopez-Mattei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#210,719
of 14,346,974 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
#1
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,879
of 189,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,346,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them