↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Continuous glucose monitoring reveals glycemic variability and hypoglycemia after vertical sleeve gastrectomy in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Metabolism, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Continuous glucose monitoring reveals glycemic variability and hypoglycemia after vertical sleeve gastrectomy in rats
Published in
Molecular Metabolism, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.12.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon S. Evers, Ki-Suk Kim, Nadejda Bozadjieva, Alfor G. Lewis, Diana Farris, Matthew J. Sorensen, Youngsoo Kim, Steven E. Whitesall, Robert T. Kennedy, Daniel E. Michele, Randy J. Seeley, Darleen A. Sandoval

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,486,681
of 14,346,974 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Metabolism
#206
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,239
of 300,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Metabolism
#21
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,346,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.