↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Achieving the High-Value Colectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
Title
Achieving the High-Value Colectomy
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, January 2020
DOI 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joceline Vuong-Thu Vu, Jun Li, Donald S. Likosky, Edward C. Norton, Darrell A. Campbell, Scott E. Regenbogen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,102,668
of 14,368,945 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#198
of 3,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,851
of 320,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#16
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,368,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.