| Title |
An anionic, endosome-escaping polymer to potentiate intracellular delivery of cationic peptides, biomacromolecules, and nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-12906-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian C. Evans, R. Brock Fletcher, Kameron V. Kilchrist, Eric A. Dailing, Alvin J. Mukalel, Juan M. Colazo, Matthew Oliver, Joyce Cheung-Flynn, Colleen M. Brophy, John W. Tierney, Jeffrey S. Isenberg, Kurt D. Hankenson, Kedar Ghimire, Cynthia Lander, Charles A. Gersbach, Craig L. Duvall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 64% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Guinea | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 26 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,490,760
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#29,444
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,784
of 381,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#808
of 1,475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.