↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Genomic prediction of depression risk and resilience under stress

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
226 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
Title
Genomic prediction of depression risk and resilience under stress
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, October 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41562-019-0759-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Fang, Laura Scott, Peter Song, Margit Burmeister, Srijan Sen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#62,239
of 13,778,033 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#92
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,707
of 216,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#10
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,778,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.