↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1811424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart J Spechler, John G Hunter, Karen M Jones, Robert Lee, Brian R Smith, Hiroshi Mashimo, Vivian M Sanchez, Kerry B Dunbar, Thai H Pham, Uma K Murthy, Taewan Kim, Christian S Jackson, Jason M Wallen, Erik C von Rosenvinge, Jonathan P Pearl, Loren Laine, Anthony W Kim, Andrew M Kaz, Roger P Tatum, Ziad F Gellad, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan, Joel H Rubenstein, Amir A Ghaferi, Wai-Kit Lo, Ronald S Fernando, Bobby S Chan, Shirley C Paski, Dawn Provenzale, Donald O Castell, David Lieberman, Rhonda F Souza, William D Chey, Stuart R Warren, Anne Davis-Karim, Shelby D Melton, Robert M Genta, Tracey Serpi, Kousick Biswas, Grant D Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 425 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 28 14%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 67 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 77 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 441. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#65,067
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,971
of 32,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,295
of 370,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#50
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.