↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1811424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart J. Spechler, John G. Hunter, Karen M. Jones, Robert Lee, Brian R. Smith, Hiroshi Mashimo, Vivian M. Sanchez, Kerry B. Dunbar, Thai H. Pham, Uma K. Murthy, Taewan Kim, Christian S. Jackson, Jason M. Wallen, Erik C. von Rosenvinge, Jonathan P. Pearl, Loren Laine, Anthony W. Kim, Andrew M. Kaz, Roger P. Tatum, Ziad F. Gellad, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan, Joel H. Rubenstein, Amir A. Ghaferi, Wai-Kit Lo, Ronald S. Fernando, Bobby S. Chan, Shirley C. Paski, Dawn Provenzale, Donald O. Castell, David Lieberman, Rhonda F. Souza, William D. Chey, Stuart R. Warren, Anne Davis-Karim, Shelby D. Melton, Robert M. Genta, Tracey Serpi, Kousick Biswas, Grant D. Huang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 451 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Other 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 61%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 461. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#21,727
of 14,370,478 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#876
of 26,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#753
of 265,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#35
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,370,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.